[ exact phrase in "" • ~10 sec • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


LOCATION/TYPE

News Home
Archive
RSS

Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Sign up for daily updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links

Alerts

Press Releases

FAQs

Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics

Videos

Allied Groups

Wind farm resistance continues  

An Independent candidate who stood in this month’s election is keeping up his fight to stop a contentious wind farm from being erected at the Bleak House site.

Strong opinions over whether or not Cannock should be home to a wind farm have been in the news for months. Dozens of local residents say they are opposed to the proposal, which would see three 200ft turbines erected on the vacant land. A series of high profile consultations into the matter have been held throughout the district, which showed residents and councillors alike are divided in opinion.

One man opposed to the plan, Independent candidate Colin Thompson, opposed the development as one of his campaign promises.

Now, after failing to clinch the Heath Hayes and Wimblebury seat on May 1, Colin said he is as determined as ever to halt the development – and said he has rucks of local support.

Colin, of Brisbane Way, told The Post: “As a first time candidate, I represented the growing concern among residents on the wind farm development because of several local and wildlife issues. “The results showed that there are many people out there who are very concerned with what may happen to our area and health (with the arrival of a wind farm). “I support renewable energy and believe that wind farms do have a place in creating our needed energy, but not inland…(they should be) offshore.

“On recent calculations the proposed wind farm would only reduce production at the Rugeley Power Station by 0.16percent, making it necessary for 600 other wind farms to be developed in our area to just close one power station.”

icCannock

15 May 2008

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate

Share:


News Watch Home

Get the Facts Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

Wind Watch on Facebook

Share

CONTACT DONATE PRIVACY ABOUT SEARCH
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.
Share

Wind Watch on Facebook

Follow Wind Watch on Twitter