[ exact phrase in "" • ~10 sec • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]



LOCATION/TYPE

News Home
Archive
RSS

Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Sign up for daily updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links

Alerts

Press Releases

FAQs

Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics

Videos

Allied Groups

Scarweather – the convenient half-truth  

In the interests of balanced journalism, I have a number of issues with the Scarweather article published in the Western Mail recently under the banner of Sustainable Wales.

The article on Scarweather should have been called The Convenient Half-Truth.

A key fact conveniently ignored by the pro-Scarweather lobby is that the inspector at the public inquiry into Scarweather recommended that planning permission should be refused on the grounds that the visual impact would be significant and harmful.

This view was also supported by the National Assembly’s own planning department.

Despite this, a Welsh Assembly committee subsequently over-ruled the public inquiry and granted planning permission.

The article mentions the Greenpeace survey in 2003, stating that more than three times as many local residents support the Scarweather offshore wind farm proposal for Swansea Bay than oppose it. Unfortunately, this does not tell the whole story.

Out of 506 adults surveyed by ICM on behalf of Greenpeace, over a two-day period in the Neath/Port Talbot, Swansea and Bridgend areas, they only managed to find 137 adults who strongly supported the building of Scarweather.

Contrast this with the strength of feeling against this development by the local community. More than 3,100 letters of objection were written and signed by objectors and sent to the TWA offices in London, with just nine letters of support.

Porthcawl Town Council, Bridgend Borough Council, Swansea City Council and many local organisations all voted against this development.

The fact that the public inquiry also came to the conclusion that the development should not go ahead shows that the fears of the local community (ie, that Porthcawl’s position as a tourist resort would be damaged) were valid.

The Sustainable Wales article comments that the supporters of Scarweather have been treated shabbily.

It is unfortunate that Sustainable Wales does not recognise the shabby treatment dished out to the people of Porthcawl and the surrounding area with regard to their wishes.

As anyone living in Porthcawl knows, you will not be able to miss rows of spinning turbines, 32 storeys high, stretching from Hutchwns Point to Sker Point.

ADRIAN BATES

Curlew Close, Rest Bay, Porthcawl

Western Mail

icWales

14 May 2008

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate

Share:


News Watch Home

Get the Facts Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

Wind Watch on Facebook

Share

CONTACT DONATE PRIVACY ABOUT SEARCH
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.
Share

 Follow: