[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

when your community is targeted

Get weekly updates

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Stripe

Donate via Paypal

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

Cash offer for windfarm village 

Villages surrounding a proposed south Norfolk windfarm stand to gain in the region of £20,000 a year for community-based projects if the plans are given the green light.

Diss-based green energy company Enertrag UK says that if its plans to build seven 125m-high turbines at Hempnall are approved it will set up a trust fund and make money available for the community on a yearly basis for the 25-year lifespan of the windfarm.

Some residents believe the money, which would come from the revenue generated from electricity sold to the National Grid, would prove a valuable asset.

In a letter to the Mercury’s sister paper the EDP, villager John Ellis said: “As the majority of the Hempnall residents would not see or hear the turbines from their homes, this to me seems a very good idea which so far has not been accepted.

“There are discussions at the moment between Hempnall Parish Council and the Playing Field Users’ Association for a hard-surface fenced area on the playing field; £20,000 per year would come in very handy.”

But South Norfolk district councillor Michael Windridge, who is leading the opposition campaign against the plans, said: “The so-called ‘community grant’ which Enertrag is seeking to offer is the most cynical attempt yet to win over local public opinion.”

In a report to planners, Enertrag says: “A trust fund is available on a yearly basis for the duration of the windfarm; this is available to the villages that surround the site for communities, clubs, schools and any other community-based project.

“This trust fund will also cover the cost of setting up and maintaining the mitigated areas. As one of these areas is presently maintained under other grants that the parish council precept covers, technically the precept could be lowered thus benefiting the whole community financially. Where possible, Enertrag UK employs local people for consultancy and construction, therefore the area will also benefit from local spend.”

But Mr Windridge laughed off the suggestion that the funds could be used to lower the parish precept. He said: “As far as I know the only payment the parish council makes is a £700 grant to the mowing of the parish church yard. There could be no possible reduction in the parish precept.”

Enertrag’s project manager, David Linley, said that it was normal for green energy companies to set up trust funds. He said: “This is something we normally do. Because we are going to be operating the windfarm for 25 years and want to be part of the community, we set up a trust fund. The amount would depend on factors like revenue but an estimate of £20,000 a year would not be untoward. People could ask for payments from that trust fund for community projects.”

Mr Linley said a trust fund had been set up for villages surrounding its windfarm at North Pickenham, near Swaffham. “Out of that trust we have paid for speeding signs and in the summer a small wind turbine will be going up at the primary school to educate the children about wind power and provide electricity for the school,” Mr Linley added.

A shadow was cast over the Hempnall plans last night after it emerged that Norwich International airport will be objecting to the proposals on safety grounds.

In an e-mail to South Norfolk Council, Elliott Summers, senior airport operations director, says that his safeguarding co-ordinator will be writing formally in due course.

The Ministry of Defence has told the council that it has no objection to the proposals.

Emily Dennis

Eastern Daily Press

15 May 2008

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Contributions
   Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)
Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)


e-mail X FB LI M TG TS G Share

News Watch Home

Get the Facts
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.


Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook Wind Watch on Linked In

Wind Watch on Mastodon Wind Watch on Truth Social

Wind Watch on Gab Wind Watch on Bluesky