[ exact phrase in "" • ~10 sec • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]

LOCATION/TYPE

News Home
Archive
RSS

Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Sign up for daily updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links

Alerts

Press Releases

FAQs

Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics

Videos

Allied Groups

Committee sends wind farm project to County Board  

EUREKA – For the second time in less than one week, a Woodford County committee has voted to send a controversial wind farm development before the full County Board after the project has sat in limbo for nearly one year.

The county’s Conservation, Planning and Zoning Committee today recommended by a vote of 3-2 that the proposed El Paso wind farm be placed on the agenda for consideration at its May 20 meeting. The motion was put forth by board member Larry Whitaker who, along with Gary Jones and Committee Chairman James Finke, voted in favor of it. Opposed were board members Thomas Evans and Thomas Karr.

At the zoning meeting, typically sparsely attended, about two dozen members of the public sat waiting to hear the vote, which has reignited the debate in the county surrounding wind farms.

Whitaker stressed during this evening’s meeting that his aim was to give the full board the chance to discuss the 40-turbine project, which he said the board has been unable to do since the project gained the recommendation from the Zoning Board of Appeals last year. The move would also keep the public aware of the project’s status and return it to the county’s forefront, Whitaker added.

“The intent here is to try to make sure the public business is done in front of the public,” he said. “What the board decides to do next Tuesday is the board’s business.”

The move comes on the heels of another 3-2 vote also introduced by Whitaker at the county’s Road and Bridge Committee that made a similar recommendation.

By Frank Radosevich II

Peoria Journal Star

13 May 2008

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate

Share:


News Watch Home

Get the Facts Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

Wind Watch on Facebook

Share

CONTACT DONATE PRIVACY ABOUT SEARCH
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.
Share

Wind Watch on Facebook

Follow Wind Watch on Twitter