LOCATION/TYPE

NEWS HOME

[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Archive
RSS

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Get weekly updates

WHAT TO DO
when your community is targeted

RSS

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Stripe

Donate via Paypal

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links

Alerts

Press Releases

FAQs

Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics

Videos

Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

Wind farm inquiry opens amid fears for future of standing stones 

Weeks after plans to locate Europe’s biggest wind farm on Lewis were refused, a public inquiry opened on the island yesterday into another controversial wind farm proposal.

Opponents are concerned it would set the prehistoric Callanish standing stones in an industrial landscape.

City financier Nicholas Oppenheim originally wanted to build 133 turbines on his Eishken Estate in Pairc, in the south-east of Lewis but the plans have been scaled down to 53 after representations from environmentalists, including the RSPB who were concerned at the impact on birds of prey such as golden eagles.

However, bodies such as the John Muir Trust (JMT) remain implacably opposed because the turbines, which would each stand 125m in height, would be visible from the circle of 13 standing stones at Callanish. In addition, 30 of them would be located in the South Lewis, Harris and North Uist Scenic Area (NSA).

Mr Oppenheim and his developer Beinn Mhor Power claim their plans would provide enough electricity for 13,000 homes. In addition, the community would get six turbines, which would generate about £1m a year.

Helen McDade, the trust’s head of policy, said yesterday: “Over 20,000 people travelled to see the Callanish last year. The setting is as much part of the experience for visitors as the stones themselves. It is ludicrous that the government would even entertain the idea of marching turbines across such a world-class landscape.”

JMT was convinced the short-term economic benefits from the Eishken proposal were far outweighed by the damage it could do to a world-famous tourist attraction. “Scotland can easily meet its 50% renewable target by 2020 without encroaching on designated areas of national importance such as this one,” she added. “This proposal would degrade both our cultural and our natural heritage and should be rejected in line with stated government policy.

“Callanish is Scotland’s equivalent of Stonehenge.”

David Ross
Highland Correspondent

The Herald

14 May 2008

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
   Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)
Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)

Share:

e-mail X FB LI M TG TS G Share


News Watch Home

Get the Facts
CONTACT DONATE PRIVACY ABOUT SEARCH
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.

 Follow:

Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook Wind Watch on Linked In

Wind Watch on Mastodon Wind Watch on Truth Social

Wind Watch on Gab Wind Watch on Bluesky