[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


News Home

Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Sign up for daily updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

Bid to curb wind farm fight costs fizzles  

A legislative move to keep Delmarva Power from having its customers foot the bill for the Bluewater wind farm fight fizzled today, at least temporarily.

House Concurrent Resolution 50, whose prime sponsor is Rep. John J. Kowalko, D-Newark South, recommends that the Public Service Commission deny any request by Delmarva to pass on the costs to ratepayers.

But Kowalko’s resolution encountered heavy weather in the House Energy and Natural Resources Committee, whose chairman, Ocean View Republican Rep. Gerald W. Hocker, blasted it as “one of the most anti-business pieces of legislation I have seen.”

Kowalko defended the resolution as “a protection for the ratepayers.”

Delmarva has spent an estimated $142,000 in its advertising campaign thus far, or about 50 cents for each of its 280,000-some customers.

“When you’re talking about 50 cents per customer for the truth to get out, I think this is an anti-business piece of legislation,” Hocker said.

Delmarva lobbyist Joseph P. Farley told the committee that the company has “every right to have a public notice to tell everyone in the state of Delaware how expensive Bluewater is.”

Advertising expenses will be borne by the stockholders, Farley said, but other legitimate expenses will be submitted for PSC approval.

Delmarva is opposing a proposed 25-year contract that would force it to buy power from Bluewater, which wants to build a wind farm off Delaware’s Atlantic coast.

Kowalko decided to table the resolution to revise its language to more clearly define his intent. Committee members also said they were disappointed that no one from the PSC attended the hearing, and that they would request that the agency send a representative when a subsequent hearing is held.

By J.L. Miller

The News Journal


8 May 2008

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate


News Watch Home

Get the Facts Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

Wind Watch on Facebook


© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.