LOCATION/TYPE

NEWS HOME


[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]

Archive
RSS

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

WHAT TO DO
when your community is targeted

Get weekly updates
RSS

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Stripe

Donate via Paypal

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links

Alerts

Press Releases

FAQs

Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics

Videos

Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

QEH turbine refused after MoD objection 

Plans for an 80m wind turbine in the grounds of the Queen Elizabeth Hospital in King’s Lynn were thrown out by councillors this morning.

Health chiefs devised the scheme with renewable energy company Ecotricity as the hospital attempts to become the first public sector organisation in the country to generate its own green energy.

But an objection was received from the MoD which claimed the turbine would cause “unacceptable interference” to the air traffic control radar at nearby RAF Marham.

West Norfolk Council’s Development Control Board was told that the Defence Estates’ claims, along with concerns from the operators of the Hospital Air Ambulance about flight safety, were viewed as fundamental objections to the plan.

Councillors voted against the development and added further reasons for refusal including the possible impact on road safety, wildlife and the surrounding neighbourhood – even though no objections were received from highways or environmental officers.

A spokesman for Ecotricity said the company was in direct contact with both of the major objectors and asked for the decision to be deferred to give them time to resolve the issues.

But a motion to postpone the decision was defeated by a single-vote margin.

Cllr William Daws said: “It seems to me there has not been enough discussion before coming to planning.

“It could be months before the MoD decide to respond. We are talking about something that is 200ft high with helicopters buzzing around it. I don’t think that is safe.

“There is enough information in the report to refuse it.”

Chris Hill

Eastern Daily Press

28 April 2008

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Contributions
   Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)
Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)

Share:

e-mail X FB LI M TG TS G Share


News Watch Home

Get the Facts
CONTACT DONATE PRIVACY ABOUT SEARCH
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.

 Follow:

Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook Wind Watch on Linked In

Wind Watch on Mastodon Wind Watch on Truth Social

Wind Watch on Gab Wind Watch on Bluesky