Please take a minute to help keep us online.
To preserve our independence, we are not funded by any political or industry groups, and we do not host ads. Wind Watch relies entirely on user donations, every penny of which goes directly to keeping the web site running.
Stripe:  |
PayPal/Venmo:  |
Haycock eyes rules for wind turbines
Translate: FROM English | TO English
Translate: FROM English | TO English
When it comes to wind energy, the opinions of Haycock residents blow in all directions.
Folks here were divided Monday over a proposed local law that would allow the installation of energy-harnessing wind turbines on residential properties.
Some fear the turbines will be towering eyesores whose wind-whipping will create a perpetually annoying noise, disrupting the quiet of the rural Upper Bucks township.
“You could use the term visual pollution,” said Greg Seifert, a farmer who worries the turbines will disrupt his livestock.
Seifert’s neighbor Paul Stepanoff, also a Quakertown school board member, wants to install a turbine on his property, where he already has solar panels.
Stepanoff and others say the turbines are a quiet, unobtrusive source for clean energy that will trim power bills without harming the environment.
“It’s a gray skinny thing that gets lost in the sky,” said resident Julie Fagan.
Proponents encouraged supervisors to increase the proposed allowed height of the turbine from 65 feet to 78 feet, which would allow the choice of more models and the potential for greater power generation.
Supervisors plan to have the proposed ordinance reviewed by the Bucks County Planning Commission before voting to approve it.
They say wind turbine proposals are on the way whether residents like it or not and they are trying to put sound rules in place for governing them.
To install a wind turbine under the proposed ordinance, residents would have to have at least 2 acres and set the device at least 300 feet back from the front property line, among other requirements, said Supervisor Henry DePue.
The usage would be limited to the property so wind power couldn’t be sold to neighbors, officials said.
Art Silveira encouraged supervisors to allow for a township review process that includes input from neighbors before allowing a turbine to go up.
Otherwise, “You could go on vacation, come back and have one of these things next to you,” he said.
By Christopher Ruva
Bucks County Courier Times
11 April 2008
This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.
The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.
| Wind Watch relies entirely on User Contributions |
(via Stripe) |
(via Paypal) |
Share:
[ Short URL: https://wind-watch.org/news/?p=56544 ]
