LOCATION/TYPE

NEWS HOME

[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Archive
RSS

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

WHAT TO DO
when your community is targeted

Get weekly updates
RSS

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Stripe

Donate via Paypal

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links

Alerts

Press Releases

FAQs

Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics

Videos

Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

Bid to stop wind farms 

An Otago environmental group has launched eleventh hour legal action against two massive wind farm proposals, just days before an Environment Court appeal against one of them starts.

Dunedin-based Upland Landscape Protection Society filed a judicial review with the Dunedin High Court on Wednesday saying the decisions by three councils to publicly notify TrustPower’s Mahinerangi wind farm and state power company Meridian’s Project Hayes were flawed.

The society says the Otago Regional and Central Otago and Clutha District councils failed in their statutory obligation to have adequate or sufficient information about the proposals before public notification.

Society member Ewan Carr, who co-ordinates the group’s legal action, said the electricity companies deliberately deceived the public by not providing images that would show what the wind farms would look like.

The Mahinerangi project was approved in September and Project Hayes was granted consents in October. Both decisions were appealed.

Environment Court appeals against the Mahinerangi wind farm, by the society and Contact Energy, will start on Monday, although the society will seek an adjournment while the High Court action is pursued.

TrustPower spokesman Graeme Purchas told The Press last night the society had no credibility and the company would argue against an adjournment.

The society had missed its deadline a month ago to exchange evidence and by last Friday, when TrustPower’s rebuttal had to be filed, the power company had not received any evidence from the society.

“The interesting thing is that we are two working days from the start of an Environment Court hearing and this organisation, which has failed to meet every deadline set by the court, suddenly launches a High court action,” he said.

When asked if the society was ready to present evidence on Monday, Carr said: “We’re ready to examine and cross-examine.”

The Press

www.stuff.co.nz

11 April 2008

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
   Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)
Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)

Share:

e-mail X FB LI M TG TS G Share


News Watch Home

Get the Facts
CONTACT DONATE PRIVACY ABOUT SEARCH
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.

 Follow:

Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook Wind Watch on Linked In

Wind Watch on Mastodon Wind Watch on Truth Social

Wind Watch on Gab Wind Watch on Bluesky