[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


News Home

Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Sign up for daily updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

Another MP backs wind farm protest  

The community campaign against plans to erect six wind turbines at Manor Farm, Silton, has gained the support of another MP.

Following a visit from North Dorset MP Bob Walter early last month, the Save Our Silton campaign last week received the backing of Andrew Murrison MP, whose Westbury constituency is near the site green-energy company Ecotricity hopes to place six turbines of up to 120 metres tall, almost two-and-ahalf times the height of King Alfred’s Tower at Stourhead.

The Save Our Silton campaign, chaired by village resident Chris Langham, was officially launched on 19 March following a series of public meetings about Ecotricity’s proposal, which follows its unsuccessful bid to build a wind farm at nearby Cucklington.

The proposal came to light when a document was sent to local parish and town councils and other bodies questioning whether there were any major issues that would prevent a wind farm on the site.

Mr Langham said: “Dr Murrison’s visit to Silton reminds us that the wind farm proposal is not just a parochial issue. This inappropriate, subsidy-driven, industrial development would have a negative impact on the landscape of a very broad area and on the amenity of the many people who live and work there.

“It is really good to see our MPs coming together to address this cross-constituency issue.”

The group has now launched its own website www.saveoursilton.org and is planning a series of further events, including a public meeting at the Lecture Hall, Mere, tomorrow at 7pm, which Dr Murrison plans to attend.

He said: “It seems unlikely that onshore wind turbines will do much to reduce our reliance on fossil fuels, although my objection in this case, and in the case of the Cucklington plans a few years ago, rests on the damage they can do to sensitive countryside.”

Western Gazette

3 April 2008

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate


News Watch Home

Get the Facts Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

Wind Watch on Facebook


© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.