[ exact phrase in "" • ~10 sec • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]

LOCATION/TYPE

News Home
Archive
RSS

Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Sign up for daily updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links

Alerts

Press Releases

FAQs

Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics

Videos

Allied Groups

Local officials should protect constituents, natural resources  

Garrett County’s mountain ridges are under assault by the wind turbine industry the likes of which put the gypsy moth infestation to shame. Garrett County is currently embroiled in a struggle where county commissioners are put to the test as to their role in meeting competing interests, protecting the county’s resources, and being proactive in representing the views and concerns of their constituency.

Evidence has recently been presented which suggests that, to some extent, the commissioners have not been fully forthcoming in the matter of a lease agreement the county has with Clipper LLC, a wind generator company, and the recent extension of that lease agreement to 2010.

At the Public Service Commission hearing held March 6, of the 100 or more attendees, the greatest majority by far criticized the commissioners for not representing them or the county’s best interests, and went as far as accusing them of selling out to the wind industry. The cry to the PSC by many was for protection not afforded by our own local government.

The greatest demand for electricity is at the other end of the state. The greatest source for alternative energy in the form of wind is also at the other end of the state. As demonstrated at public hearings, the great majority of Garrett County residents reject wind generation towers on public lands, and as residents learn more they are objecting to private land sites as well.

The arguments presented against wind generation in Garrett County are many and convincing. Why aren’t these arguments persuasive with the commissioners and state government? Could it be that Governor O’Malley would find it politically unacceptable to put wind towers on the waters of the Chesapeake Bay or off the Maryland coast?

So I ask, how does the individual citizen fight these powerful forces, and more importantly, why must we be in this fight? Shouldn’t local government officials represent their constituency and protect our natural resources and the safety and health of the people?

Local government is local because it best knows and understands the concerns of citizens. Local elected officials are in the best position to represent the preponderance of views of their constituency. I implore our local officials to protect our resources, be proactive in fighting those forces threatening our resources, and be forthcoming in their views and positions that relate to these issues.

Kenny Braitman

Eastern Garrett County

The Republican

13 March 2008

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate

Share:


News Watch Home

Get the Facts Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

Wind Watch on Facebook

Share

CONTACT DONATE PRIVACY ABOUT SEARCH
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.
Share

Wind Watch on Facebook

Follow Wind Watch on Twitter