[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

when your community is targeted

Get weekly updates

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Stripe

Donate via Paypal

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

Wind farms could hit tourist jobs 

Wind farms could cost Scotland’s tourism industry millions of pounds and hundreds of jobs, a report has warned.

But researchers said the “worst case scenario” was unlikely, as the two different sectors could live together.

The findings were published by Holyrood ministers, who want half of Scotland’s electricity to come from renewable sources by 2020.

Enterprise Minister Jim Mather said the report showed aspirations for tourism and green energy were compatible.

The Scottish Government wants to boost the tourism industry by 50% by 2015.

The study, carried out by Glasgow Caledonian University, focussed on the possible impact of wind farms on tourism in Caithness and Sutherland, Stirling, Perth and Kinross, the Borders and Dumfries and Galloway.

Researchers estimated the likely impact on the local tourism economy by 2015 of all the wind farms needed to meet the renewables target, compared to there being none.

They suggested Caithness and Sutherland could lose 30 jobs and £700,000 and Stirling, Perth and Kinross could be down £6.3m and 339 jobs.

In the south of Scotland, the study indicated the Borders could lose 81 jobs and £1.7m, and 277 jobs and £4.1m in and Dumfries and Galloway.

Mr Mather said of the report: “It provides further evidence to support our approach to progress the right developments in the right location.

“Harnessing our renewables potential, while driving an increase in tourism revenue, will bring sustainable economic growth to all parts of Scotland.”

The research was carried out by surveying 380 tourists in the different case study areas, an additional 600 UK and 100 US residents on the internet and using geographical analysis.

BBC News

12 March 2008

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
   Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)
Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)


e-mail X FB LI M TG TS G Share

News Watch Home

Get the Facts
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.


Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook Wind Watch on Linked In

Wind Watch on Mastodon Wind Watch on Truth Social

Wind Watch on Gab Wind Watch on Bluesky