LOCATION/TYPE

NEWS HOME

[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Archive
RSS

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

WHAT TO DO
when your community is targeted

Get weekly updates
RSS

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Stripe

Donate via Paypal

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links

Alerts

Press Releases

FAQs

Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics

Videos

Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

Wind farm firm 'did not mislead' 

A renewable energy firm did not mislead the public over claims about plans to build seven wind turbines in Shropshire, according to a watchdog.

Campaign group Vortex disputed figures and information released by Nuon Renewables and complained to the Advertising Standards Authority (ASA).

It queried facts made about electricity being used locally and meteorological conditions in the area.

But the ASA said it was satisfied with the firm’s claims.

Campaigners raised two issues contained within a Nuon Renewables brochure, a company spokesman said.

Landscape ‘decimated’

Firstly, how much electricity would meet local demand and secondly, if wind speed data was representative of meteorological conditions in north Shropshire.

The company said local needs would be met first.

However, if demand was low, for example during the middle of the night, the electricity generated would “go elsewhere on the grid”.

It clarified that the wind speed data it had released was specific to the wind farm site – in between Norton-in-Hales and Woore – where speeds were higher, as opposed to the whole of north Shropshire.

Last month campaigners flew a large balloon to demonstrate the height of the proposed turbines – 105m (344ft).

Members said the landscape would be “decimated” if the turbines were built.

Plans have not yet been submitted but the company confirmed it will apply for permission.

BBC News

27 February 2008

[See the press release from Vortex concerning the ASA findings.]

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
   Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)
Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)

Share:

e-mail X FB LI M TG TS G Share


News Watch Home

Get the Facts
CONTACT DONATE PRIVACY ABOUT SEARCH
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.

 Follow:

Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook Wind Watch on Linked In

Wind Watch on Mastodon Wind Watch on Truth Social

Wind Watch on Gab Wind Watch on Bluesky