LOCATION/TYPE

NEWS HOME

[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Archive
RSS

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

WHAT TO DO
when your community is targeted

Get weekly updates
RSS

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Stripe

Donate via Paypal

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links

Alerts

Press Releases

FAQs

Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics

Videos

Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

Holyland man may force removal of wind turbine after siting error 

A wind turbine placed 36-feet too close to a rural Johnsburg home has generated some controversy in this township of 1,100 in the northeast corner of Fond du Lac County.

Ordinances require that wind turbines be placed at least 1,000 feet – a distance of more than three football fields – from homes. However, a We Energies turbine located on a neighbor’s property near resident Bill Winkler’s town of Marshfield home came up short, by a little more than a first down.

Calls to Winkler’s home were not answered on Thursday.

Barry McNulty, a spokesman for We Energies, said the company is looking into why the turbine was placed in violation of town regulations. He said the company is also talking with town officials, Winkler and a neighbor who owns the property to find a solution to the problem.

“We are prepared to find a resolution, even if it means moving the tower,” McNulty said.

McNulty said the company is discussing several options, including asking the town for a waiver and making an agreement with the landowner and Winkler. The waiver, he said, could include making payments to the landowner.

A contractor hired by We Energies placed the turbine. McNulty said the company will be using Global Positioning System satellite data to make sure the other 88 turbines in the Green Field Blue Sky wind farm project are in compliance with town regulations.

“We will take whatever steps are necessary to rectify the situation,” he said. “It’s, no doubt, unfortunate.”

Relocating the 396-foot tall tower “won’t be inexpensive,” McNulty said.

“Moving a large wind turbine may not materially change the look of the property,” McNulty said.

Town Chairman Earl Steffen hung up when The Reporter contacted him for comment on Thursday. Town Clerk Connie Pickart said the township was not involved in the matter and had no comment.

The first of We Energies turbines in the area started generating power on Feb. 9. As of Feb. 21, nine turbines were in operation, McNulty said.

By Brett Rowland
The Reporter

Fond du Lac Reporter

22 February 2008

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
   Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)
Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)

Share:

e-mail X FB LI M TG TS G Share


News Watch Home

Get the Facts
CONTACT DONATE PRIVACY ABOUT SEARCH
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.

 Follow:

Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook Wind Watch on Linked In

Wind Watch on Mastodon Wind Watch on Truth Social

Wind Watch on Gab Wind Watch on Bluesky