[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

when your community is targeted

Get weekly updates

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Stripe

Donate via Paypal

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

Tioga County planners work on ‘problem resolution’; citizens group awaits judge’s decision about appeal 

The Tioga County Planning Commission is taking a second look at ways to deal with problems that could come along with a giant wind turbine project that it already granted “conditional preliminary approval,” Tioga County planner Jim Weaver said in a phone interview Thursday.

Wind energy company AES has filed an application with the commission to construct more than 120 wind turbines on Armenia Mountain. However, in January, a citizens group filed litigation in Tioga County court, appealing the commission’s action at its Dec. 12 meeting.

The group claims the project is not in compliance with a county land development and subdivision ordinance and that the commission “acted capriciously, abused its discretion and committed errors of law” in several manners.

Covington Township resident Leon Kocher, who has attended many of the meetings on the AES application, said he worked for Bethlehem Steel as an internal consultant for data processing.

“It was my job to solve problems,” he said. “I reviewed the application and had talked to Jim (Weaver) about potential problems with the turbines after they are up because some of them may be too close to residences not on land they (AES) have leased,” he said.

Potential problems include shadow flicker from the rotating 400-foot blades and noise from the turbine engines.

“In their application, they are vague about how they will address potential problems,” Kocher said of AES.

He added that the unfinished zoning ordinance is referenced in their application, but because it is not finished, “there is no ordinance.”

Weaver said the commission is looking at implementing some kind of “problem resolution.”

“We will be working on some standards to handle potential shadow flicker and noise problems. We may look at a stand-alone wind ordinance or amendments to our zoning ordinance. Wind energy is addressed (in the zoning ordinance) but the timing of that may be too far in the future for a problem management component to address this project,” he said.

As it stands now, “if a land owner called me with a complaint about noise, I would log that, call the company and they would have to provide us with a rebuttal of how they will handle the complaint,” Weaver said.

“Mr. Kocher’s concern is who will follow up at the county level,” he added.

“The planning commission anticipated that after construction there won’t be that many issues because of the filtering process and review,” Weaver said, “so it shouldn’t be that much of a burden on the commission to follow up on it. It is still in its infancy so there is more to come. The entire project is in limbo with the appeal.

“Until the judge has a ruling on where the land use appeal is, there won’t be much movement on their (AES) end,” he added.

The commission will continue to “check off the conditions as they (AES) satisfy them,” Weaver added, but will not be able to give them clearance to start construction until the judge makes a decision on the appeal.

“We submitted our answers to the appeal last week so the appellate has the opportunity to respond. It is in the hands of the court,” he said.

“AES anticipated starting construction in June, and so I am assuming they will have met all the conditions by then. That is, assuming the appeal has been settled,” Weaver added.

By Cheryl R. Clarke

Williamsport SunGazette

15 February 2008

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Contributions
   Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)
Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)


e-mail X FB LI M TG TS G Share

News Watch Home

Get the Facts
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.


Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook Wind Watch on Linked In

Wind Watch on Mastodon Wind Watch on Truth Social

Wind Watch on Gab Wind Watch on Bluesky