[ exact phrase in "" • ~10 sec • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


LOCATION/TYPE

News Home
Archive
RSS

Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Sign up for daily updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links

Alerts

Press Releases

FAQs

Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics

Videos

Allied Groups

County revisits UPC; Court will re-hear tower applications after LUBA ruling  

The Wasco County Court will completely re-hear two related applications by landowners to allow UPC Wind to put meteorological towers on Sevenmile Hill.

That was the decision of commissioners Wednesday, following the news that the state Land Use Board of Appeals (LUBA) was kicking back to the court its earlier decision to grant temporary use permits for the wind measurement devices, which could serve as a prelude to a controversial wind-farm on the ridge overlooking The Dalles.

In essence, LUBA agreed with the petitioners, Mark Womble and Gary and Linda Casady, that the county had erred in considering the requests as applications for temporary, rather than conditional use permits.

According to the Wasco County Land Use and Development Ordinance, temporary uses may include those not specified in the ordinance “and not so recurrent as to require a specific or general regulation to control them.”

The county had argued that meteorological towers, not being mentioned in the ordinance chapters that describe uses permitted in specific zones, met these criteria – even though they were listed in Chapter 19 (Energy Facilities) as a use permitted subject to standard.

However, LUBA said the latter listing means meteorological towers are both specified in the ordinance and controlled, indicating they are more properly considered a conditional use.

Following the higher board’s direction, commissioners voted unanimously to consider the requests “de novo” as an applications for conditional use permits.

That means a new set of perhaps marathon hearings must be held within 90 days of their being requested of the court. The most recent hearings on the subject, held Dec. 8, 2006, lasted nine hours.

By Ed Cox

The Dalles Chronicle

12 February 2008

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate

Share:


News Watch Home

Get the Facts Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

Wind Watch on Facebook

Share

CONTACT DONATE PRIVACY ABOUT SEARCH
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.
Share

Wind Watch on Facebook

Follow Wind Watch on Twitter