LOCATION/TYPE

NEWS HOME

[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Archive
RSS

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

WHAT TO DO
when your community is targeted

Get weekly updates
RSS

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Stripe

Donate via Paypal

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links

Alerts

Press Releases

FAQs

Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics

Videos

Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

No quorum, so planning meeting canceled 

ROXBURY – Due to the absence of two of three Planning Board members, Friday night’s meeting was canceled. Instead, Chairman Barry Bunten, who is also the town’s code enforcement officer, dealt with a few matters pertaining to his second position.

Regarding proposed changes to the town’s 1976 Natural Land Use Ordinance and creation of a new Mountain District Zone, Bunten said he disagrees with one condition of the new zone.

Two wind-power companies are currently interested in placing electricity-generating towers and turbines in Roxbury, which is driving the ordinance alterations. The current ordinance prohibits wind-energy facilities.

The new district will include all areas of the mountain ridge comprised of portions of Record Hill within Roxbury, Flathead Mountain, Mine Notch, Partridge Peak, and North and South Twin mountains that are at or above an elevation of 1,500 feet.

Bunten said the Mountain District Zone doesn’t allow residential structures, but should, provided they can be placed a safe distance from wind turbines.

“I think there should be a variance to have residential dwellings within so many feet of the (wind) towers,” he said, basing that on a conversation with a resident who has land at the 1,500-foot level on North Twin.

That issue, and more, will undoubtedly surface at the town meeting Monday, March 3. The ordinance issue is currently Article 60 in the town meeting warrant, which is expected to be finalized Friday, Feb. 15.

Lewiston Sun Journal

9 February 2008

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Contributions
   Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)
Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)

Share:

e-mail X FB LI M TG TS G Share


News Watch Home

Get the Facts
CONTACT DONATE PRIVACY ABOUT SEARCH
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.

 Follow:

Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook Wind Watch on Linked In

Wind Watch on Mastodon Wind Watch on Truth Social

Wind Watch on Gab Wind Watch on Bluesky