LOCATION/TYPE

NEWS HOME

[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Archive
RSS

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Get weekly updates

WHAT TO DO
when your community is targeted

RSS

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Stripe

Donate via Paypal

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links

Alerts

Press Releases

FAQs

Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics

Videos

Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

Wind lobby pushes for millions in northern subsidies 

The lobby group representing the Canadian wind energy industry is pushing Ottawa for millions of dollars in subsidies to develop wind power in remote northern communities.

CanWEA, the Canadian Wind Energy Association, wants the federal government to spend $74 million over ten years. Sean Whittaker, CanWEA’s policy director, said such a program would help the North reduce pollution and energy costs, while growing the domestic market for Canadian-built wind turbines.

“A utility is a fairly conservative entity,” he said in an interview. “What they really want is a signal, or assistance, or a push as it were from the federal government.”

Under the plan, wind energy produced in so-called “hub” communities, such as Whitehorse or Iqaluit, would benefit from a three-cent per kilowatt-hour subsidy. In more remote places -“spoke” communities – the subsidy would amount to 15 cents per kilowatt-hour.

“It’s a win for the communities,” Whittaker said. “It’s a win for Canadian manufacturers who actually are half of all the world’s manufacturers of turbines.”

Ikummatiit, Nunavut’s energy strategy released in Sept. 2007, mentions wind power as an option for alternative energy in the territory, but the strategy places greater emphasis on conservation, residual heating systems and hydroelectric power.

What Qulliq really wants is the money to build a hydroelectric dam for Iqaluit, which burns one-third of the diesel used in Nunavut’s power plants, with possible connections to other South Baffin communities.

But that costs money the utility doesn’t have and leaves dozens of other communities reliant on diesel generators.

Energy minister Ed Picco said wind power is problematic for Nunavut because none of the territory’s communities are connected by a grid. That means excess electricity produced by wind turbines can’t be absorbed by the system. And Picco said it’s also a challenge to sync windmills with diesel generators.

Nunavut used to have working wind turbines in Kugluktuk and Rankin Inlet, but they’ve been abandoned for years. Picco said the electricity they produced cost about 70 cents a kilowatt-hour.

Even under CanWEA’s plan, that’s too expensive for Nunavut Power. By contrast, one kilowatt-hour of electricity costs 37 cents to produce at Iqaluit’s diesel plant, Nunavut’s largest.

There’s also a lack of trained workers who would be able to fix the wind turbines, which are more prone to breakdowns in the harsh Arctic climate, Picco said.

But Picco is quick to say he supports CanWEA’s efforts to lobby Ottawa for clean energy subsidies. He says one way to jump start wind power production in Nunavut would be for the federal government to fund the construction of an experimental wind farm in the Kivalliq, where strong winds are the most consistent.

“The cost of running one windmill, it really isn’t feasible,” Picco said. “That’s why we’re saying we’d like to have a wind farm where you’d have 10 or 12 [turbines] in place so then the economies of scale [are there] and the business model is more affordable.”

Picco suggested Natural Resources Canada could run a wind farm for five years to “work out the bugs in the cold-weather climate.”

“At the end of that five-year period you might have a technology that we could export to other cold-weather places,” he said.

John Baird, the federal environment minister, is to visit Nunavut next week, and Picco said he’s going to use the meeting to push for money from Ottawa to develop alternative energy, particularly hydroelectric power.

“We need these guys to come to the table,” he said.

By Chris Windeyer

Nunatsiaq News

7 February 2008

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
   Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)
Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)

Share:

e-mail X FB LI M TG TS G Share


News Watch Home

Get the Facts
CONTACT DONATE PRIVACY ABOUT SEARCH
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.

 Follow:

Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook Wind Watch on Linked In

Wind Watch on Mastodon Wind Watch on Truth Social

Wind Watch on Gab Wind Watch on Bluesky