[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


News Home

Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Sign up for daily updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

Public needs more data, assurances from FPL on windmill proposal  

It does not seem wise to invest in wind-turbine energy infrastructure within a coastal high-hazard zone, especially if sustainable, long-term energy development is the goal. Hutchinson Island is an eroding barrier island subject to frequent overwash by storm events. The area south of the proposed sites has been an inlet nearly six times, and Blind Creek was cut open by the 2004 storms.

Placement of the wind turbines on the island could in fact encourage costly, damaging responses to sea-level rise and hurricanes, including sea walls and massive dredge-and-fill projects on one of the most important sea turtle nesting beaches in North America.

The public has not received assurances, much less data, as to whether these turbines can withstand hurricanes.

The review process itself started off on the wrong foot. All but one St. Lucie County commissioner tried to rubberstamp this project without public comment or confident data. Florida Power & Light told the community at the coal plant hearings there wasn’t enough wind here to be productive, presumably to get their coal plant. FPL seems only to be looking at the price of land – not at science.

Without other details, such as wind energy siting standards and the lack of statutory requirement for the state Department of Environmental Protection to oversee the siting, this project seems able to move forward without addressing very real issues that other states require to be resolved.

Before this discussion continues, FPL really needs to study whether wind is the best alternative energy for this region and properly review all sites and impacts. 

Ericka D’Avanzo

Jensen Beach


2 February 2008

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate


News Watch Home

Get the Facts Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

Wind Watch on Facebook


© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.