[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Get weekly updates

when your community is targeted


RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Stripe

Donate via Paypal

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

Sleepeezee site is set for another 'eyesore' 

Plans to erect a 30m (100ft) turbine on the proposed site of the London Regional Fire Control Centre have put the wind up neighbouring residents.

The huge construction would be part of the building on the former Sleepeezee site in Morden, which is set to be home to one of nine regional emergency call handling centres.

It would be close to the vast, new Big Yellow Storage Company warehouse, which has enraged some residents with its massive size and garish colour.

The Willmore End Residents’ Association, which approves of the office part of the new plans, has deemed the turbine aspect “ludicrous”.

The association’s Bruce Dixon said: “The locals have already had their eyes smacked out by the Big Yellow warehouse on the same site, but this turbine will be more than twice the height of that.

“We’re all as green as we can be, but there comes a point where it gets a bit silly.

“And if they really want to be green, why are they putting in 31 car parking spaces?”

Along with some solar panels, the towering turbine is set to cut at least 10 per cent of the projects’s carbon emissions, meeting the requirements of the council’s pioneering Merton Rule policy for commercial developments.

Environmental experts say the wind turbine needs to be that high in order to be effective, and it would take about six turbines of half the size to generate the same amount of power .

Mike Forster, of applicants the Easter Group, said: “We think the wind turbine would be far enough away so as not to be a problem for residents, but if it is, it’s something we need to deal with.”

John Hill, head of public protection and development at Merton Council, added: “John Hill, Head of Public Protection & Development said: “The impact of the wind turbine on neighbouring amenity, both in respect of the size and noise generated, will be a material consideration in the determination of the planning application.”

By Diana Pilkington

Bucks Free Press

28 January 2008

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
   Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)
Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)


e-mail X FB LI M TG TS G Share

News Watch Home

Get the Facts
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.


Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook Wind Watch on Linked In

Wind Watch on Mastodon Wind Watch on Truth Social

Wind Watch on Gab Wind Watch on Bluesky