LOCATION/TYPE

NEWS HOME

[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Archive
RSS

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Get weekly updates

WHAT TO DO
when your community is targeted

RSS

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Stripe

Donate via Paypal

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links

Alerts

Press Releases

FAQs

Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics

Videos

Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

Wind farm concerns capture Knox County Board’s attention 

Several Knox County Board members said Wednesday it was time for the county to begin addressing concerns about wind farms.

One issue raised Wednesday by Member Greg Bacon, D-District 2, was the permit fees for industrial and private use. A couple building a 67-foot wind tower is being charged the same fees as a for-profit company. Bacon said a two-tiered system is needed for private individuals versus companies.

With wind energy company Invenergy beginning to put up structures to measure the area’s wind capacity, Board Chairman Allen Pickrel, R-District 1, said several issues need to be addressed. One of his biggest concerns is protecting farmers from contract language that grants the company easements rather than leases. The second is setting up a bonding procedure to make sure the county has money to decommission towers in case the company goes bankrupt.

In other business, Knox County Supervisor of Assessments Chris Gray, said the three buildings known as CRC Cherry Street Facility, more commonly referred to as St. Mary’s Square, had received tax exempt status from the Illinois Department of Revenue. It had applied in 2004 and 2006, and was rejected both times. CRC appealed the 2006 ruling, and in December the Department of Revenue granted it.

Therefore, all the taxing bodies that received the $187,500 in taxes St. Mary’s Square contributed will not get their share of the money in 2008 and will have to repay the money from 2007. Gray did not have figures in front of her for the county’s portion, but said it was “way less than half,” adding Galesburg District 205 would get the biggest hit.

By Matt Hutton

The Register-Mail

24 January 2008

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
   Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)
Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)

Share:

e-mail X FB LI M TG TS G Share


News Watch Home

Get the Facts
CONTACT DONATE PRIVACY ABOUT SEARCH
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.

 Follow:

Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook Wind Watch on Linked In

Wind Watch on Mastodon Wind Watch on Truth Social

Wind Watch on Gab Wind Watch on Bluesky