LOCATION/TYPE

NEWS HOME



[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]

Archive
RSS

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

WHAT TO DO
when your community is targeted

Get weekly updates
RSS

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Stripe

Donate via Paypal

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links

Alerts

Press Releases

FAQs

Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics

Videos

Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

Safety fears as turbines toppled 

Campaigners are welcoming an inquiry into the safety of wind turbines after two came crashing down.

The manufacturer behind some of the largest wind turbines planned for use in the North-East is conducting an internal review to find why two of its structures buckled in high winds and collapsed.

The Health and Safety Executive (HSE) has launched an investigation but is awaiting the results of the company’s own review before it decides what action to take.

The first turbine collapsed in Scotland last November, followed by a second collapse near Dalston, Cumbria, last week.

That turbine was at Hesket Newmarket, west of the M6 motorway, half way between Carlisle and Penrith.

The turbines, manufactured by Vestas, are the same model as the six in use at the Sunderland Nissan site. A further six Vestas turbines are planned for the Barmoor site near Berwick, Northumberland.

The machines are thought to be the only turbines to have collapsed in the UK.

Wind farm campaigner John Ferguson, from Northumberland group Save Our Unspoilt Landscape, welcomed the inquiry.

He said: “If there is a risk, then it is important we find out now rather than when the turbines are in operation.

“The British Wind Energy Association and others seem to brush over the risk here, but these are serious safety concerns.

“How long before the renewable energy industry is subject to the same public scrutiny as other industries?”

Berwick Council is currently considering an application by Force 9 Energy to install six 110.5-metre turbines at Barmoor.

A council spokeswoman said the turbines proposed were subject to change and she would not comment further on the Vestas inquiry. After the Cumbria collapse the British Wind Energy Association, which represents 98% of UK wind energy firms, pledged to help the HSE and abide by any decisions reached. The 11-tonne Cumbrian turbine had been in operation for 19 years.

The collapse came just two months after the Scottish turbine at a wind farm in Argyll and Bute “bent in half” during strong winds.

Scottish Power, which runs the site, switched off 26 turbines for 14 days while it investigated the collapse. The two incidents involved the V47 turbine, which is the subject of the immediate HSE concerns.

An HSE spokesman said: “The manufacturer has informed us they are looking into this and the HSE will act on their findings.

“This is very much an ongoing investigation and it would be inappropriate to comment further. We will await their findings and then Government scientists will look into it further.”

The Journal attempted to contact Vestas via its press office in Denmark, but a spokesman was not available to comment.

Force 9 Energy was repeatedly approached for comment on the safety issue but was not available yesterday.

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Venerable machine

THE Cumbrian turbine was the region’s oldest and its collapse is thought to be the first such incident in England.

The turbine fell on January 4, landing alongside a quiet country road in the Hesket Newmarket area.

The 100ft turbine weighed 11 tonnes and had been in regular use throughout its 19-year
history.

No one was hurt when it collapsed at 11.30am.

After the Cumbria crash the British Wind Energy Association said it was the first it had heard of.

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Burning blades amazed drivers

THE latest safety concerns are not the first time the Vestas have come under scrutiny.

In December 2005, staff at the Nissan car plant near Sunderland watched as a turbine continued to turn while fire blazed across its blades.

The turbine had been leaking oil and when engineers switched it back on, the problem they thought they had solved caused a fire that could be seen for miles around.

Hundreds of motorists on the A19 watched as the carbon fibre rotor blades caught fire and broke off.

Firefighters who tackled the blaze said they had received more than 200 calls. Witnesses said the turbine had looked like a giant, flaming Catherine wheel.

The turbine was replaced the following year.

By Adrian Pearson

The Journal

12 January 2008

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Contributions
   Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)
Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)

Share:

e-mail X FB LI M TG TS G Share


News Watch Home

Get the Facts
CONTACT DONATE PRIVACY ABOUT SEARCH
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.

 Follow:

Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook Wind Watch on Linked In

Wind Watch on Mastodon Wind Watch on Truth Social

Wind Watch on Gab Wind Watch on Bluesky