[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Get weekly updates

when your community is targeted


RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Paypal

Donate via Stripe

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

Bronze Age blow to windfarms 

Controversial windfarm plans could be blown away after Bronze Age remains were found at a Cumbrian site.

West Coast Energy has applied to build nine 335ft-high wind turbines at Berrier Hill near Greystoke, Penrith.

The proposals have attracted strong opposition, with local people joining together to fight the windfarm plans.

This week they claimed an early victory after their concerns about the historical value of the site were upheld.

It follows news that the Office of the County Archaeologist has now written to Eden Council planners to underline its significance.

It is known that the Berrier Hill site contains ancient earthworks and the remains of Bronze Age cremation burials.

However, the full scale and importance of these artefacts have yet to be fully defined.

In a letter to planning officer Malcolm Johnson, assistant archaeologist Jeremy Parsons calls for the energy company to fund a detailed study.

He recommends that a full archaeological survey is carried out before any application can even be considered.

The results would give the County Archaeologist and English Heritage a clear indication of what lies below the land – and whether they should protect the site using Scheduled Monument Status.

The Berrier Hill Wind Opposition Group are now hoping that the plans will be thrown out without the need for a lengthy planning battle.

They believe that as well as Bronze Age remains, there may be other important discoveries at the site, which has views across to the Castlerigg Stone Circle near Keswick.

In a statement released this week the group said: “Clearly one consequence of any survey is that the remains and artefacts would have to be preserved in situ, and this would have a knock-on effect on the viability and appropriate nature of the site for an industrial development.

“This is excellent news and underlies our concern that from the beginning this has been the wrong site for a wind farm. Samantha Crosby, West Coast Energy’s project manager, confirmed that they were aware of the latest request and were more than happy to comply.

She explained that a standard survey has already been competed and a more detailed evaluation of the site would get under way in the new year.

By Pamela McGowan

The Cumberland News

21 December 2007

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
   Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)
Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)


e-mail X FB LI TG TG Share

News Watch Home

Get the Facts
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.


Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook

Wind Watch on Linked In Wind Watch on Mastodon