[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


News Home

Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Sign up for daily updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

Law reveals the turmoil of turbines  

South Gippsland Shire is demanding the landowners wanting to subdivide tell likely buyers of the “detrimental” effect of the Bald Hills Wind Farm.

Some landowners believe the requirement opens the door for them to seek compensation for lowered land values. The first landowner to be hit by the requirement is Noel Uren.

Mr Uren, who did not wish to comment, must tell those inquiring about his subdivision about the detrimental effects of wind turbine noise, blade flicker and blade glint.

The council’s condition is believed to be the first legal requirement of its kind. The council opposed the wind farm being built, but was powerless to stop it.

Neighbouring landowner Don Fairbrother said the council’s requirement was “black and white” recognition of his concerns. “It does raise serious questions about where we go from here” he said.

“This has repercussions for the area around every wind farm in Victoria.”

Mr Fairbrother said it was unclear how many properties would constitute a “buffer zone” for the 10km long wind farm.

Wind Power director Andrew Newbold said he was ‘staggered’ at the council’s action.

“I don’t know tha they’re qualified to give that assessment….the conditions under which we’re building are in complliance with all regulations and standards,” he said.

Councillor David Lewis said the ruling was designed to avoid legal battles.

“People buying into this area can’t say they didn’t know” Cr Lewis said.

“The intention is to protect ratepayers from legal confrontations with large companies over noise issues.”

Cr Lewis has since spoken to residents who “raised good issues” and conceded the condition may have created more headaches than it solved.

A valuer told Mr Fairbrother in 2004 that the wind farm devalued his property by more than $350,000.

Cr Lewis agreed Mr Uren’s property had also been devalued. Mr Uren’s subdivision lots are more than 40ha, large enough for a residence.

He can appeal the condition at the Victorian Civil and Administrative Tribunal.

Mr Fairbrother said the turbines were a danger to white-bellied sea eagles, orange-bellied parrots, swift parrots and snipe.

“The conditions say that if any of those birds are killed, towers will be shut down – investors need to know that,” he said.

By Leslie White

The Weekly Times

12 December 2007

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate


News Watch Home

Get the Facts Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

Wind Watch on Facebook


© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.