LOCATION/TYPE

NEWS HOME

[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]



Archive
RSS

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Get weekly updates

WHAT TO DO
when your community is targeted

RSS

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Paypal

Donate via Stripe

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links

Alerts

Press Releases

FAQs

Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics

Videos

Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

Bluewater's project costs are being misinterpreted 

It amazes me that this newspaper, which generally informs people, continues to promote and obfuscate with respect to Bluewater Wind.

Bluewater announced a decrease in the price in the latest power purchase agreement, when the actual price increased from $116 to $125. The News Journal focused on the price change on one of the three parts of the price.

The newspaper focuses on the additional cost per month of some mythical and inaccurate measure at around $6. The more likely increase is $22. By the way, these are wholesale prices not retail.

The price of wind from the grid is $86 per megawatt. For offshore wind from Bluewater, it is $125.

Offshore wind is generally agreed to cost 50 percent more to build, and 500 percent more to maintain. Because it is so costly, the General Assembly is either going to tax those who don’t use this expensive power or take away rights given during deregulation.

In addition, it intends to force Delmarva Power to sign a contract with Bluewater if they don’t voluntarily agree. Not only are businesses going to pay for power they don’t receive, involuntary contracts are now part of the business environment.

On top of this is a new carbon tax to provide money for those in government who are intent on making people poor while they pursue their social agenda.

A carbon tax, the wind farm tax and expensive power will have no impact on air quality or health in Delaware. A better approach would include energy- sensitive building codes, energy audits at occupancy, and better education about energy use.

Ed Ratledge, Newark

The News Journal

18 December 2007

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
   Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)
Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)

Share:

e-mail X FB LI TG TG Share


News Watch Home

Get the Facts
CONTACT DONATE PRIVACY ABOUT SEARCH
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.

 Follow:

Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook

Wind Watch on Linked In Wind Watch on Mastodon