LOCATION/TYPE

NEWS HOME



[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]

Archive
RSS

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

WHAT TO DO
when your community is targeted

Get weekly updates
RSS

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Stripe

Donate via Paypal

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links

Alerts

Press Releases

FAQs

Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics

Videos

Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

Further votes problem for supervisor 

This letter is in response to a recent article titled “Criter ‘disappointed’ by recall efforts.”

In the article, Jerry Criter quoted extensively from a letter he received from the District Attorney Ken Kratz.

What he didn’t quote was the final paragraph of that letter from the district attorney to Jerry Criter, which is:

“I would caution that any future official action taken in which you have a financial interest may lead to a sanction under 19.59, or criminal prosecution under the misconduct in public office statutes.”

The facts are:

A. Jerry Criter plans to install a number of wind turbines on his property.

B. Jerry Criter will receive financial gain from those wind turbines.

C. Jerry Criter continues to vote on wind turbine issues.

Jerry Criter has stated that the corporation counsel and the district attorney have given him permission to vote on the wind turbine ordinance. And yet, the last paragraph quoted above specifically prohibits him from voting on issues in which he will benefit financially, including wind turbines.

It is hard to misinterpret the last paragraph of the district attorney’s letter to Jerry Criter.

If the citizens of Calumet County can’t trust him to act according to the clear mandate in that last paragraph, how can Jerry Criter be trusted to make other decisions that protect and benefit Calumet County as a whole, rather than promote his personal financial gain?

Erv Selk

Chilton

Tri-County News

13 December 2007

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Contributions
   Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)
Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)

Share:

e-mail X FB LI M TG TS G Share


News Watch Home

Get the Facts
CONTACT DONATE PRIVACY ABOUT SEARCH
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.

 Follow:

Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook Wind Watch on Linked In

Wind Watch on Mastodon Wind Watch on Truth Social

Wind Watch on Gab Wind Watch on Bluesky