[ exact phrase in "" • ~10 sec • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]

LOCATION/TYPE

News Home
Archive
RSS

Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Sign up for daily updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links

Alerts

Press Releases

FAQs

Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics

Videos

Allied Groups

SMMPA seeks damages for alleged wind-turbine problems  

A power agency claims it has suffered damages exceeding $7 million stemming from defects in four wind-energy generation turbines in the western Minnesota.

Southern Minnesota Municipal Power Agency, based in Rochester, is asking a district court judge to order the defendant, Vestas American Wind Technology Inc. of California to resolve the dispute through arbitration.

Gerald Duffy of Minneapolis, attorney for SMMPA, filed the complaint Thursday in Olmsted District Court.

According to court documents, Duffy says the Turbine Supply and Installation Agreement provides for binding arbitration in disputes. He said SMMPA owns four wind-energy generation turbines. Two are around Fairmont, and two are around Redwood Falls. The turbines were sold to Vestas by NEG Micon USA Inc. The turbine agreement contains a provision mandating arbitration of disputes.

SMMPA alleges that the turbines have design and manufacturing defects. Duffy said Vestas has refused to address the defects. As a result, he says, SMMPA has lost revenue from down-time caused by system failures. In addition, the defects have accelerated the depreciation of the turbines and their components, there has been a loss of future revenue from the down-time, there have been increased costs, and there has damage to crops and long-term damage to cropland from ground compression due to crane movement.

The complaint said SMMPA demanded arbitration on Nov. 1. On Nov. 14, James Filiault, corporate counsel for Vestas, responded by saying SMMPA’s demand for arbitration was a breach of the dispute-resolution provisions of the agreement. He said SMMPA cannot circumvent the requirement for negotiation of disputes set forth in the agreement.

He said they also disagree with SMMPA’s proposal that Richard Solum serve as the arbitrator.

Filiault asked that SMMPA “promptly withdraw its demand for arbitration.” That led to SMMPA filing the complaint in district court for arbitration.

No hearing date has been set.

By Janice Gregorson

Post-Bulletin

10 December 2007

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate

Share:


News Watch Home

Get the Facts Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

Wind Watch on Facebook

Share

CONTACT DONATE PRIVACY ABOUT SEARCH
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.
Share

Wind Watch on Facebook

Follow Wind Watch on Twitter