News Home

[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Sign up for daily updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

News Watch Home

MP tells Parliament wind farm claims are just hot air  

A North Staffordshire MP has incurred the wrath of environmentalists by branding wind farms “extremely damaging environmentally” and “over-subsidised”.

Stone’s Conservative MP Bill Cash told MPs he would “vigorously oppose” wind farm plans at Maer Hills, near Newcastle, and Norton-in-Hales, near the Staffordshire-Shropshire border.

In a Westminster debate he said wind projects often “do not work and are over-subsidised” and challenged ministers to concentrate more on “clean coal” technology. Challenged by Liberal Democrats as to why he opposed wind farms, he replied: “Frankly, they just do not work and are over-subsidised. There is a great deal of opposition in my constituency to the non-productive use of such technologies, which are completely useless according to the evidence that we have received.”

Although he said he was talking specifically about the Midlands, he said he treated “the whole issue of wind farms with a great deal of scepticism” and said he thought they were “extremely damaging environmentally”.

Plans for the wind farms at Maer Hills – where Claymoss Properties has won permission for two 60-metre masts – and Norton-in-Hales – where Nuon wants to put seven turbines on farmland – have both provoked opposition from local people. Mr Cash was talking in a debate he secured in Parliament’s Westminster Hall, where he urged Energy Minister Malcolm Wicks to cut the amount of cash paid in subsidies towards wind power. He said renewable electricity generators were effectively being subsidised by £1billion a year at the moment. He said: “Would some of the substantial moneys that go to wind power, which is the major beneficiary, not be better spent on projects such as clean coal.”

The Sentinel

29 November 2007

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate


News Watch Home

Get the Facts Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

Wind Watch on Facebook


© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.