LOCATION/TYPE

NEWS HOME

[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Archive
RSS

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

WHAT TO DO
when your community is targeted

Get weekly updates
RSS

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Stripe

Donate via Paypal

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links

Alerts

Press Releases

FAQs

Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics

Videos

Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

Wind Farm Inquiry Day 2 — Morning 

Arguments over whether Middlemoor can be classed as a ‘medium’ scale wind farm development have dominated the second morning of the public inquiry.

On Tuesday, npower planning witness David Stewart spoke extensively on planning policy as it applied to the proposed 18-turbine scheme, including potential impacts on landscape and tourism.

He also challenged earlier definitions of ‘medium-scale’ wind farms, made by Alnwick District Council, as generating less than 50 megawatts of power.

That, he said, had since been superceded by the emerging Regional Spatial Strategy, which defines medium as between 20 and 25 turbines.

But in his cross-examination of Mr Stewart yesterday, Alnwick District Council advocate Paul Tucker said the cumulative total number of wind turbines outlined for the area – including the recently rejected bid for 10 at neighbouring Wandylaw – exceeded that figure.

The Wandylaw application may still go to appeal.

He said: “Together, Middlemoor and Wandylaw put that total beyond the top of the range.

“And this is just one small part of a total area defined in the draft strategy as suitable for a medium-scaled wind development.”

But Mr Stewart replied: “The first task of the inspector is to look at Middlemoor on its own merits, because we don’t know where the Wandylaw application is going next.

“Middlemoor is below that range and we can only look at what we have in front of us.”

Northumberland Gazette

14 November 2007

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
   Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)
Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)

Share:

e-mail X FB LI M TG TS G Share


News Watch Home

Get the Facts
CONTACT DONATE PRIVACY ABOUT SEARCH
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.

 Follow:

Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook Wind Watch on Linked In

Wind Watch on Mastodon Wind Watch on Truth Social

Wind Watch on Gab Wind Watch on Bluesky