LOCATION/TYPE

NEWS HOME

[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Archive
RSS

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Get weekly updates

WHAT TO DO
when your community is targeted

RSS

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Paypal

Donate via Stripe

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links

Alerts

Press Releases

FAQs

Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics

Videos

Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

No windmills on our hills, Vermont group will tell SC 

Environmentalists intend challenging in the Vermont Supreme Court recent approval for a large out-state wind-power company to build turbines atop a popular mountain ridge.

Local conservation group Ridge Protectors opposes plans by Newton, Mass.-based UPC Wind to erect 16 wind turbines 425 feet high in the Hardscrabble Mountains near the town of Sheffield. It claims UPC Wind plans four more similar plants in the wider region, known as the Northeast Kingdom.

UPC Wind announced early August that the Sheffield wind-power project had gotten the nod from industry regulator the Vermont Public Service Board (VPSB). The release said UPC Wind had worked for the previous 18 months to meet a range of environmental concerns about the project but will monitor the political climate.

“[C]larifying state legislation regarding the tax rate on renewable energy projects remains a key component to this project,” UPC Wind Project Manager Matt Kearns stated. “Passage of legislation supporting wind farm development will put Vermont on track as a leader in renewable energy.”

But AP reported last week that Ridge Protectors would appeal VPSB’s approval of the Sheffield wind farm to the Vermont Supreme Court. The group claims the VPSB misapplied Vermont law and drew conclusions not in keeping with facts in the hearing record.

Ridge Protectors claims it opposes construction of the towers over fears they will prove unsightly in a popular tourist destination and harm birds and other wild life. UPC Wind states it consulted the Vermont Agency of Natural Resources to minimize these problems.

By Rob Luke

Legal Newsline

5 November 2007

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
   Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)
Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)

Share:

e-mail X FB LI TG TG Share


News Watch Home

Get the Facts
CONTACT DONATE PRIVACY ABOUT SEARCH
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.

 Follow:

Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook

Wind Watch on Linked In Wind Watch on Mastodon