[ exact phrase in "" • ~10 sec • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]

LOCATION/TYPE

News Home
Archive
RSS

Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Sign up for daily updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links

Alerts

Press Releases

FAQs

Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics

Videos

Allied Groups

No windmills on our hills, Vermont group will tell SC  

Environmentalists intend challenging in the Vermont Supreme Court recent approval for a large out-state wind-power company to build turbines atop a popular mountain ridge.

Local conservation group Ridge Protectors opposes plans by Newton, Mass.-based UPC Wind to erect 16 wind turbines 425 feet high in the Hardscrabble Mountains near the town of Sheffield. It claims UPC Wind plans four more similar plants in the wider region, known as the Northeast Kingdom.

UPC Wind announced early August that the Sheffield wind-power project had gotten the nod from industry regulator the Vermont Public Service Board (VPSB). The release said UPC Wind had worked for the previous 18 months to meet a range of environmental concerns about the project but will monitor the political climate.

“[C]larifying state legislation regarding the tax rate on renewable energy projects remains a key component to this project,” UPC Wind Project Manager Matt Kearns stated. “Passage of legislation supporting wind farm development will put Vermont on track as a leader in renewable energy.”

But AP reported last week that Ridge Protectors would appeal VPSB’s approval of the Sheffield wind farm to the Vermont Supreme Court. The group claims the VPSB misapplied Vermont law and drew conclusions not in keeping with facts in the hearing record.

Ridge Protectors claims it opposes construction of the towers over fears they will prove unsightly in a popular tourist destination and harm birds and other wild life. UPC Wind states it consulted the Vermont Agency of Natural Resources to minimize these problems.

By Rob Luke

Legal Newsline

5 November 2007

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate

Share:


News Watch Home

Get the Facts Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

Wind Watch on Facebook

Share

CONTACT DONATE PRIVACY ABOUT SEARCH
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.
Share

Wind Watch on Facebook

Follow Wind Watch on Twitter