[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

when your community is targeted

Get weekly updates

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Stripe

Donate via Paypal

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

Call for review of green belt laws 

The head of the official body set up to protect the English countryside will today call for a review of laws protecting the green belt, amid accusations from conservationists he has been “toothless” in facing up to the Government’s massive housing plans.

Sir Martin Doughty, chairman of Natural England, will say in a speech to mark the body’s first anniversary that the Government’s determination to build three million new homes by 2020 means that “the sanctity of green belt land should be questioned.”

He will say the green belt was invented 70 years ago as a solution to development pressures of the time and “was certainly not intended to deal with the complex environmental challenges that face us today.”

“Nobody could deny, and we do not, that the green belt has achieved its primary purpose in constraining urban sprawl,” Sir Martin will say.

“But the consequence of this is that development tends to leapfrog over the green belt and land in much more vulnerable parts of the natural environment.

“We must therefore review the green belt and commit more effort to making the green belt something that adds value.”

Sir Martin wants environmentally friendly developments to be allowed on the 4.2 million acres of green belt designed to prevent urban sprawl, so the more remote countryside can be protected from development.

However, conservationists accuse Natural England of failing to fulfil its original remit as an “independent and powerful guardian of our natural landscape” by accepting Government projections that three million new homes are needed by 2020 in the first place, and by going along with the Government’s proposed speeding up of the planning system.

In a report to mark the agency’s first anniversary, the Campaign to Protect Rural England accuses Natural England of failing to recognise the outstanding quality of much green belt land – in the Chilterns and Surrey Hills, Delamere Forest in Cheshire or in parts of the Pennines.

It also accuses Natural England of facilitating clean energy developments – from wind farms to the Severn Barrage – instead of carrying out its statutory duty to protect landscapes and habitats and the wider natural environment.

It says the agency “should avoid acting, either deliberately or unwittingly, as a proxy for the renewable energy industry, which already has many champions in Government”.

Tom Oliver, head of rural policy at the campaign, said: “We have yet to be convinced that the new agency will be effective in engaging with the powerful threat of a weakened planning system and mounting pressure for over-development beyond environmental capacity.

“There is also a risk that we seriously harm magnificent and wild places with renewable energy infrastructure in the name of saving them from climate change.”

A further criticism of the agency in the campaign’s report is that it has weakened its position in its first year by deciding to start afresh and develop new policies across its whole remit rather than depend on the experience of its predecessor bodies, English Nature and the Countryside Agency.

By Charles Clover, Environment Editor


29 October 2007

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
   Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)
Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)


e-mail X FB LI M TG TS G Share

News Watch Home

Get the Facts
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.


Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook Wind Watch on Linked In

Wind Watch on Mastodon Wind Watch on Truth Social

Wind Watch on Gab Wind Watch on Bluesky