Please take a minute to help keep us online.
To preserve our independence, we are not funded by any political or industry groups, and we do not host ads. Wind Watch relies entirely on user donations, every penny of which goes directly to keeping the web site running.
Stripe:  |
PayPal/Venmo:  |
Development pollution fears
Translate: FROM English | TO English
Translate: FROM English | TO English
The construction of a wind farm on Ballindalloch Muir near Balfron could lead to pollution of the countryside, campaigners have warned.
Villagers who have formed a group to fight npower renewables’ plan for nine 400-feet turbines, claim there was pollution of the land, rivers and burns after the existing Braes of Doune wind farm, developed by Airtricity, was built.
Now Endrick Valley Action Group (EVAG) say they fear the same will happen to the River Endrick and surrounding West Stirlingshire countryside.
They say that before the wind turbines are erected, giant pits have to be dug out of the ground and filled with concrete as a base for each of the turbine towers.
EVAG say disruption of this scale is bound to have a detrimental effect.
Chairman of EVAG, Gordon Adams, said: “Giant holes will be dug out of our countryside and thousands of tons of concrete will be poured into these holes. Natural ground water running through this concrete could become toxic and carry these toxins through the land into burns and rivers.
“The general disruption caused by this massive building operation will pollute the countryside damaging wildlife, plant life and our streams and rivers.
“You just have to look at the pollution caused by the construction of the Braes of Doune wind farm”
EVAG also says that npower’s proposed wind farm is too close to Balfron and will be seen for miles around, creating a negative visual impact on the scenery.
The group also points to some medical reports claiming that low-frequency noise from wind turbines could cause headaches and other ailments.
Npower have said they are unable to address any issues raised about other developers but that they have a solid record of acting responsibly and safeguarding the environment. They also refuted the claims over noise and visual impact.
5 October 2007
This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.
The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.
| Wind Watch relies entirely on User Contributions |
(via Stripe) |
(via Paypal) |
Share:
[ Short URL: https://wind-watch.org/news/?p=7458 ]
