[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


News Home

Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Sign up for daily updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

Councillors throw out plans for windfarm  

The development of a windfarm with turbines which would have towered 300ft above the Aberdeenshire countryside was categorically rejected by councillors yesterday.

An application by NPower Renewables for eight turbines on Clashnarae Hill, Alford, was thrown out by the Marr area committee.

The plan attracted fierce criticism from locals, who submitted 162 letters of objection and formed their own campaign group to oppose the development.

They argued that the windfarm would be a blot on the landscape and would cause irreparable damage to habitats at the Kildrummy site, designated an area of ‘landscape significance’ by Aberdeenshire Council.

Douglas Williamson, secretary of Kildrummy Windfarm Action Group suggested that the recent decision by the Scottish Government to reject plans for a windfarm at Clashindarroch meant it would be “unreasonable and damaging” for Aberdeenshire Council to take issue with “such clear guidelines”.

He said: “The land at Kildrummy is of even greater environmental value.

“Since our Scottish Government thinks Clashindarroch is unacceptable, it is even less acceptable for Kildrummy.”

The Cairngorms National Park Authority also opposed the scheme and Scottish National Heritage and the Royal Society for the Protection of Birds both noted concerns about the potential impact on wildlife.

Senior project manager Mark Crawford told the committee that he accepted the windfarm would have a significant impact on the landscape but argued there was a difference “between significant and unacceptable”.

Councillors were unanimous in their opposition to the scheme. Councillor Peter Argyle said regardless of their views on windfarms it contravened planning policy and should be rejected.

Councillor Marcus Humphrey added: “I think it is very simple. We have a policy about an area of landscape significance and this breaches it.”

Speaking after the meeting Mr Williamson said he was “absolutely delighted” by the decision.

The Press and Journal

26 September 2007

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate


News Watch Home

Get the Facts Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

Wind Watch on Facebook


© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.