LOCATION/TYPE

NEWS HOME

[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Archive
RSS

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Get weekly updates

WHAT TO DO
when your community is targeted

RSS

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Stripe

Donate via Paypal

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links

Alerts

Press Releases

FAQs

Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics

Videos

Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

Councillors throw out plans for windfarm 

The development of a windfarm with turbines which would have towered 300ft above the Aberdeenshire countryside was categorically rejected by councillors yesterday.

An application by NPower Renewables for eight turbines on Clashnarae Hill, Alford, was thrown out by the Marr area committee.

The plan attracted fierce criticism from locals, who submitted 162 letters of objection and formed their own campaign group to oppose the development.

They argued that the windfarm would be a blot on the landscape and would cause irreparable damage to habitats at the Kildrummy site, designated an area of ‘landscape significance’ by Aberdeenshire Council.

Douglas Williamson, secretary of Kildrummy Windfarm Action Group suggested that the recent decision by the Scottish Government to reject plans for a windfarm at Clashindarroch meant it would be “unreasonable and damaging” for Aberdeenshire Council to take issue with “such clear guidelines”.

He said: “The land at Kildrummy is of even greater environmental value.

“Since our Scottish Government thinks Clashindarroch is unacceptable, it is even less acceptable for Kildrummy.”

The Cairngorms National Park Authority also opposed the scheme and Scottish National Heritage and the Royal Society for the Protection of Birds both noted concerns about the potential impact on wildlife.

Senior project manager Mark Crawford told the committee that he accepted the windfarm would have a significant impact on the landscape but argued there was a difference “between significant and unacceptable”.

Councillors were unanimous in their opposition to the scheme. Councillor Peter Argyle said regardless of their views on windfarms it contravened planning policy and should be rejected.

Councillor Marcus Humphrey added: “I think it is very simple. We have a policy about an area of landscape significance and this breaches it.”

Speaking after the meeting Mr Williamson said he was “absolutely delighted” by the decision.

The Press and Journal

26 September 2007

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
   Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)
Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)

Share:

e-mail X FB LI M TG TS G Share


News Watch Home

Get the Facts
CONTACT DONATE PRIVACY ABOUT SEARCH
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.

 Follow:

Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook Wind Watch on Linked In

Wind Watch on Mastodon Wind Watch on Truth Social

Wind Watch on Gab Wind Watch on Bluesky