[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


News Home

Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Sign up for daily updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

Wind farm may face review  

A judicial review may be sought after controversial offshore wind farm plans took a step nearer reality.

EDF Energy has been given the green light to progress plans for its offshore wind farm project at Redcar.

The wind farm would be one and a half kilometres from the shore, with up to 30 turbines capable of producing enough electricity to supply the annual requirements of around 60,000 households.

But Redcar and Cleveland Council has outlined concerns about the proximity of the turbines to the shore and is considering whether to seek a judicial review on the decision.

Council Leader, Councillor George Dunning, said: “Redcar and Cleveland Council fully supports renewable energy concepts. However to build 30 huge wind turbines so close to the shoreline could be detrimental to the leisure projects to regenerate not only Redcar but the whole of the borough.

“The film Atonement was a big boost for the whole of Redcar and Cleveland. Would Atonement’s director Joe Wright have considered Redcar beach for Atonement with 30 wind turbines on the shoreline?”

He added: “The council will be seriously looking at their options, one of them may well be to seek a judicial review on this decision to ensure every opportunity is being explored to minimise the impact on local communities.”

Protest group Save Our Shoreline (SOS) has also said it is not opposed to renewable energy, but is against the close proximity of the wind farm to the beach.

Jim Conaghan, a member of SOS, added: “This wind farm is in Phase 1 of the Government’s plan. Several years ago, Phase 2 was introduced, which says all such wind farms now must be a minimum of five miles from the shore, eight miles if there are protected birds at risk.”

By Michelle Ruane, Evening Gazette


19 September 2007

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate


News Watch Home

Get the Facts Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

Wind Watch on Facebook


© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.