[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


News Home

Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Sign up for daily updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

Wind turbines to be built despite residents' fears  

Another three new wind turbines are to be built in the North-east.

The Formartine Area committee has approved plans for the development Kirktown of Auchterless, near Turriff.

A total of 20 people wrote to the committee objecting to the proposal for the three 80 metre-high structures.

The complaints included the impact the turbines would have on bird life and ecology, and noise issues.

Wayne Riddell, one of the objectors, said they would have a devastating effect on nearby wild geese.

He said: “It is proposed to erect giant windmills in the birds’ flight path so they will be bashed to bits.

“I strongly oppose the ad-hoc proliferation of these huge eyesores which are blighting Scotland’s beautiful landscape for very little benefit.”

But the committee has authorised officers to give the go ahead to the turbines, which will feed into the national grid, subject to 23 conditions.

One of the turbines was going to be rejected because it was too close to homes.

At times, homes within 620 metres will be able to see a shadow cast by the wind turbine as it moves, and one of the three proposed turbines was within 550 metres of houses.

The company installing the turbines, Green Cat Renewables, has been asked to investigate ways of reducing this “shadow flicker” – although it will only be for an estimated 3.2 hours per year.

The wind turbines have an estimated lifetime of 20 years, although it is possible the site will be used as a wind energy facility for longer.

Chairman John Loveday said: “There was some suggestion one of the turbines should be moved because it was too close to houses.

“But in the end the committee decided on balance to vote for all three.

“I know there is often an argument to put all these things on top of a hill somewhere far away, but that is not really possible around this area.”

The Press and Journal

19 September 2007

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate


News Watch Home

Get the Facts Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

Wind Watch on Facebook


© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.