[ exact phrase in "" • ~10 sec • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]

LOCATION/TYPE

News Home
Archive
RSS

Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Sign up for daily updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links

Alerts

Press Releases

FAQs

Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics

Videos

Allied Groups

Pylon inquiry 'fair' says Mather  

A Scottish Government minister has defended the conduct of the public inquiry into a 137-mile power line.

Scotland’s biggest public inquiry is currently being held into proposals for a line of pylons from Beauly in the Highlands to Denny near Falkirk.

Deputy Scottish Tory leader Murdo Fraser described the process as “seriously flawed”.

However, Enterprise Minister Jim Mather insisted the inquiry was being conducted fairly.

“Calls to stop or redirect the inquiry would be at odds with the need for an objective process that listens and reaches a balanced judgment,” he said.

Mr Mather was replying to a Holyrood debate launched by Mr Fraser, MSP for Mid Scotland and Fife.

He had complained that the inquiry was not giving a fair hearing to objectors.

Mr Fraser complained of evidence being “dismissed” as inadmissible on deadline grounds by the inquiry reporters.

He also said other evidence was not being examined fully as the reports were sticking “rigidly” to the inquiry timetable.

Mr Fraser said: “Evidence being dismissed, evidence not being fully investigated, poor treatment of witnesses giving evidence, an assumption that a power line is needed, no real chance to discuss alternatives – I believe that all of this is fundamentally wrong.”

Patrick Harvie, Green MSP for Glasgow region, told MSPs: “Reasonable people need to expect a reasonable process.”

And Dr Richard Simpson, Labour MSP for Mid Scotland and Fife region, said: “If the process is not correct, then the decision may not be correct.”

Mr Mather insisted the inquiry timetable had not been set arbitrarily.

And while some had argued that more time should have been allocated, the aim should be “the tightest timescale that allows adequate and fair examination”.

The minister said the inquiry reporter had only refused to take late evidence in cases where no “cogent” reason had been put forward as to why it was being provided late.

The scheme would see 600 pylons up to 65m (213ft) high replacing the existing transmission line.

The inquiry is due to continue until the end of the year.

BBC News

19 September 2007

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate

Share:


News Watch Home

Get the Facts Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

Wind Watch on Facebook

Share

CONTACT DONATE PRIVACY ABOUT SEARCH
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.
Share

Wind Watch on Facebook

Follow Wind Watch on Twitter