[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


News Home

Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Sign up for daily updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

Stroupster wind farm ballot plan  

A public ballot is being held into npower renewables’ fresh bid to win the go-ahead for a wind farm in north-east Caithness.

The company wants to put up 12 turbines and ancillary facilities on forested land off the A99 at the Hill of Stroupster, near Auckengill.

The scheme was rejected in May of last year by the Highland Council’s now-disbanded Caithness area planning committee. But the company has tabled an almost identical follow-up application for the turbines, which would have a blade-tip height of 113 metres.

Dunnet and Canisbay Community Council is to commission a postal ballot to find out the views of the 1150 or so people in the two parishes.

It will be carried out after the pros and cons of the wind farm have been debated at a public meeting due to be held in Auckengill Hall next month.

Speaking after the community council’s meeting on Wednesday, chairman John Green said they were committed to abide by the outcome of the vote.

“There has not been a lot of public debate about the wind-farm proposal at Stroupster – I wouldn’t say it’s the talk of the parish,” he said.

“It is, however, a very important issue and we hope the public meeting will help give people a flavour of the arguments, both for and against.”

Npower renewables and Caithness Windfarm Information Forum (CWIF) are to be invited to make presentations.

The community council was not formed when the first application for the wind farm was being processed.

Mr Green, who was then Highland councillor for Caithness North-East, supported the unanimous committee decision to refuse the plans.

The cost of the ballot is being paid for by npower renewables but Mr Green stressed this would not compromise its integrity.

He said: “We are asking the Electoral Reform Society to do the ballot so it will be completely independent. We couldn’t afford to fund it.

“The developers are footing the bill, but that won’t in any way affect the outcome. What it does mean is that local people are getting the opportunity to express their views.”

The final decision on the Stroupster plans will be taken by Scottish ministers.

The community council, meanwhile, reaffirmed its policy of not taking a line on wind-farm proposals outwith its area.

A group of CWIF supporters lobbied them to firm up a stance on the current plans for turbine ventures at Durran and Spittal Hill. They claimed these should be on the community council’s agenda as if either or both schemes got the go-ahead the turbines would be clearly seen from parts of Dunnet and Canisbay.

Mr Green said: “We had already taken a decision not to consider schemes from outwith our patch and we reaffirmed that at our meeting.”

By Iain Grant

John O’Groat Journal

14 September 2007

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate


News Watch Home

Get the Facts Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

Wind Watch on Facebook


© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.