[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


News Home

Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Sign up for daily updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

PUC talks wind power  

The first step was in July and the next one may be soon.

The Public Utilities Commission of Texas met Wednesday with wind energy on the agenda.

While it took no action, that should change. The group is working to make the preliminary order to establish Competitive Renewable Energy Zones final, with details added.

“The indication is it will be signed and filed next week,” said PUC spokesman Terry Hadley.

That would mark the end of the first phase of getting wind energy going in the Panhandle on a larger scale.

However, there are concerns on at least one team’s part that those added details could be a problem.

Shell WindEnergy and Luminant have a partnership agreement to develop a 3,000-megawatt wind farm in Briscoe County.

The final order is to include the guidelines for the Electric Reliability Council of Texas to study where to build transmission lines to get the power from wind farms to population centers and who should do the building, as suggested by PUC Chairman Paul Hudson.

The problem is there may be a cap of 1,000 megawatts per project.

The PUC received a letter from Shell on Tuesday that said it was “unclear whether the chairman’s suggestion of such a cap is merely a suggested per-project cap for the purpose of the assumptions required for the ERCOT transmission study or whether it is intended to be something more.”

“If the suggestion is that the Commission should seek to impose an arbitrary limitation on the size of any project to be developed, that would be a matter of genuine concern,” the letter stated.

In other business, the PUC commissioners voted to send a dispute between John Deere Wind, a developer of wind farms in the northern Panhandle, and Southwestern Public Service to mediation prior to a hearing by a judge in the State Office of Hearings.

“It’s a cost dispute on the price they receive on the electricity they generate,” said Wes Reeves, spokesman for Xcel Energy, owner of SPS.

Commissioners also approved a request from SPS to change the way it figures its fuel costs. Those costs are passed directly on to customers.

“Hopefully it will allow us to capture the cost better,” Reeves said. “Sometimes when we go back we see we charged too much or too little, and this may keep us from having to do refunds or surcharges. We’d like to be a little more accurate.”

By Kevin Welch


14 September 2007

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate


News Watch Home

Get the Facts Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

Wind Watch on Facebook


© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.