[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


News Home

Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Sign up for daily updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

Changes ahead for windfarm objectors  

A legal ruling is expected today which could have major implications for windfarm objectors.

The Court of Session will consider a demand from Highland Council and developers Amec which could establish the precedent that a challenger to a windpark planning decision must prove – in advance – that they have the necessary finances to cover the costs of both parties in the event of defeat.

Their case is against Skye windfarm opponent John Hodgson, who has fought a long battle against plans, recently approved by councillors, for a 17-turbine scheme at Edinbane.

His organisation, the Skye Windfarm Action Group (Swag), was initially granted leave by the Court of Session to challenge the planning consent for the project and a hearing date set for July 2008.

The council and Amec were subsequently granted leave for an earlier hearing date when Lord Clarke accepted the council’s argument that it needed to establish if it was in the wrong in order to address any similar complaints about other windfarms in the planning process.

That hearing will now start on October 2, 2007.

Today’s hearing will consider the court application from Highland Council and Amec for “caution for expenses” to the tune of £120,000.

The council will argue that it has to “protect council tax-payers”.

Swag alleges Highland Council failed to ensure Amec’s planning application was accompanied by a sufficient environmental impact assessment, failed to outline reasons for not considering alternative sites, failed to consider a potential flood risk from the scheme and that there were procedural anomalies concerning planning consent for a borrow pit (quarry).

It also claims the authority breached EU habitats legislation.

EC law states that any such legal challenge “shall be fair, equitable, timely and not prohibitively expensive.”

Fewer than half the members of the council’s planning committee attended the Portree meeting which unanimously approved the Edinbane plan.

The Press and Journal

6 September 2007

Skye Windfarm Action Group (SWAG): sw-ag.org

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate


News Watch Home

Get the Facts Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

Wind Watch on Facebook


© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.