[ exact phrase in "" • ~10 sec • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]

LOCATION/TYPE

News Home
Archive
RSS

Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Sign up for daily updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links

Alerts

Press Releases

FAQs

Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics

Videos

Allied Groups

Wind farm action looks to pay off  

An action group and nearly 300 individual objectors are on course to win the first round of their battle to halt an eight-turbine windfarm being built on scenic Dunion Hill near Jedburgh.

The Southern can reveal that planning officials of Scottish Borders Council are recommending that councillors next week reject the detailed bid of Windjen Power Ltd to develop the prominent site, nearly 1,000ft above sea level and two miles south of the town on Bedrule Farm.

“It’s fantastic news, but the war is not yet won,” said Andrew Nicholson, chairman of the Dunion Hill Conservation Group (DHCG).

That campaigning body, whose members include quantity surveyors and geologists, was formed shortly after Windjen announced its plans two years ago and in the wake of several public meetings. It recently commissioned its own 70-page environmental impact assessment (EIA) as a direct counter to a similar document from Emtec, the renewables consultancy representing Windjen.

The applicants want to generate electricity for 25 years from eight turbines, 101m-high from base to upper blade tip. Each will generate 2.5MW and be connected to the National Grid via a substation and underground cables. New access roads will be required. The DHCG alleges the Emtec evaluation of the impact of the windfarm is inaccurate across a range of criteria.

Ian Aikman, SBC’s development control manager, appears to agree in a report due to go to Monday’s meeting of the planning committee.

“The proposed windfarm will have a significant adverse impact on the landscape character of the Dunion [and nearby Black Law ridge] and the wider countryside,” states Mr Aikman.

“The development would be highly visible within a 5km radius to a wide variety and number of receptors [local residents].”

Emtec assessed that just 19 properties out of 122 in the 5km zone would experience “significant visual effects”.

The DHCG claims the omission of houses in Lanton, Denholm and Jedburgh gives an inaccurate understanding of the size of the population who would regularly view the power station. The actual figure was
1,951.

Visibility is the lynchpin of the dissenters’ case and the DHCG quotes from the following Scottish Natural Heritage landscape assessment of Dunion Hill: “Perception of this landscape might be said to closely encompass the essence of the Border heartland”.

“With spectacular views across Teviotdale to the north, the Merse to the north-east, the Jed Water valley to the east and the Cheviots to the south, this is quite unlike any other windfarm site already approved in the region,” said Mr Nicholson.

“It will have a huge impact on the tourism on which the Borders economy and local businesses increasingly depend. For instance, the popular Borders Abbeys Way would lead walkers between two of the Windjen turbines.”

The council has received 289 letters of objection, reinforcing concerns over the effect on walking, cycling and horseriding and claiming no local economic benefit would accrue.

By Andrew Keddie

The Southern Reporter

6 September 2007

Dunion Hill Conservation Group: dunionhill-conservation.org.uk

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate

Share:


News Watch Home

Get the Facts Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

Wind Watch on Facebook

Share

CONTACT DONATE PRIVACY ABOUT SEARCH
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.
Share

Wind Watch on Facebook

Follow Wind Watch on Twitter