LOCATION/TYPE

NEWS HOME

[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Archive
RSS

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Get weekly updates

WHAT TO DO
when your community is targeted

RSS

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Stripe

Donate via Paypal

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links

Alerts

Press Releases

FAQs

Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics

Videos

Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

Airtricity won't share data 

HARTSVILLE – Whether Airtricity’s wind data is showing positive or negative results will remain company information only – it’s not being made public.

That’s what Airtricity Project Manager Bob Sherwin said today. He said Airtricity does not make the data public, because it costs a lot of money to gather and is part of the competitive process.

“That’s part of our competitive advantage,” he said.

Several meteorological masts were installed to gather information on the wind resources in the Hartsville and Hornellsville area from Oct. 1 to Dec. 31, 2006.

According to Airtricity’s Web site, a meteorological mast provides accurate records of local wind resources, and a minimum of one year of wind data is required before banks feel safe enough to finance the loans to support a wind project.

Sherwin said Airtricity likes to collect data for several years.

“We don’t draw conclusions after just one year,” he said, adding there could be an anomalous year. “The more data we have, the more certain we are.”

Steve Dombert, candidate for town supervisor in Hartsville and vocal windfarm opponent, said the fact Airtricity does not make their data public suggests the company doesn’t want to share it because it isn’t good.

“The data is really the measurement as to whether the project is worthwhile or not,” he said.

Dombert said he has heard the wind data could be yielding disappointing results. He also said there seems to be little activity taking place in regard to the project itself.

“I look at what they’re doing, not what they’re saying,” he said.

Dombert said the meteorological towers, which were placed on Call Hill, are 6 miles from the power grid. He said wind farms are usually placed only 3 miles from power grids.

“There are a lot of things about this project that are not ideal,” he said. “My feeling is that the whole thing has been put on hold for some reason.

By Jen Carpenter
Staff Writer

Hornell Evening Tribune

29 August 2007

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
   Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)
Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)

Share:

e-mail X FB LI M TG TS G Share


News Watch Home

Get the Facts
CONTACT DONATE PRIVACY ABOUT SEARCH
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.

 Follow:

Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook Wind Watch on Linked In

Wind Watch on Mastodon Wind Watch on Truth Social

Wind Watch on Gab Wind Watch on Bluesky