LOCATION/TYPE

NEWS HOME

[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Archive
RSS

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

WHAT TO DO
when your community is targeted

Get weekly updates
RSS

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Stripe

Donate via Paypal

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links

Alerts

Press Releases

FAQs

Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics

Videos

Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

Planners warned of windfarm dangers 

Highland planners were warned yesterday that they risked flooding communities and landing taxpayers with huge fines if they approved a raft of windfarm applications in a wildlife haven on the edge of the Cairngorms National Park.

Scottish Tory MEP Struan Stevenson told local objectors to five schemes planned for the pristine Dava Moor near Grantown that he had submitted their complaints to EC Environment Commissioner Stavros Dimas.

He hoped the commissioner’s legal officers would visit to verify that, cumulatively, the projects would breach bird, peat bog and habitat legislation.

The proposed developments – at Berryburn, Cairn Duhie, Dunearn, Tom nan Clach and Glenkirk – would comprise 130 turbines, averaging 425ft in height in an area popular with walkers and other tourists.

The central point of Lochindorb, between the Spey and Findhorn rivers, is famed for endangered species including golden eagles, capercaillies and larks.

Mr Stevenson told an audience of 60 people at a Grantown hotel: “Each turbine would have 1,000 tonnes of concrete at its foundation and 30 miles of roadway linking them all for servicing purposes. It would industrialise a whole virgin landscape which is unique in Scotland.

“No one knows the consequences of excavating a four-metre-deep (13ft) blanket peat bog which has taken thousands of years to form.

“The fragile hydrology of the whole Dava basin is going to be disturbed. You could have flooding in the whole community.”

He urged the council to “put on hold” further consideration of the schemes until the commission decided if there was a case to answer.

Ray Hunter, of Renewable Energy Systems, one of the five firms hoping to establish a local scheme, said: “The likelihood is that only those windfarms that meet very exact planning criteria will go ahead and I’m sure the developers, collectively, would be very surprised themselves were there to be five consents.”

A spokesman for the council said: “We will always take into account all comments in assessing any application.”

The Press and Journal

24 August 2007

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Contributions
   Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)
Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)

Share:

e-mail X FB LI M TG TS G Share


News Watch Home

Get the Facts
CONTACT DONATE PRIVACY ABOUT SEARCH
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.

 Follow:

Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook Wind Watch on Linked In

Wind Watch on Mastodon Wind Watch on Truth Social

Wind Watch on Gab Wind Watch on Bluesky