[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


News Home

Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Sign up for daily updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

Charity's anger at pylons probe  

A leading conservation charity has provided MSPs of all parties with documents it claims prove that the Scottish Executive’s costly public inquiry into the Beauly-Denny pylon proposals is weighted in the developers’ favour, and urged the politicians to intervene.

A week before the year-long £7million hearing resumes in Newtonmore to focus on the local implications of Scottish and Southern Energy’s proposed power line replacement, the John Muir Trust (JMT) has armed MSPs with accounts from each side of the debate which it claims verify inconsistencies in the way the three-man “reporters unit” has allowed transmission firm Shetl privileges that were not granted to representatives of the 18,000 objectors. The charity’s policy officer, Helen McDade, complains that “the procedural irregularities go from bad to worse”.

She reaffirms a much-recounted complaint that, at various stages of the process, objectors have had insufficient time to digest vast documents submitted at late notice by Scottish and Southern Energy and Shetl, while claiming to prove that the same deadlines have not been applied to the developers. This has left lay people ill-prepared to face barristers representing the electricity giants.

Ms McDade has told MSPs that “the principles of equity and fairness have been breached time and again”.

A spokeswoman for the executive said: “We won’t comment during an inquiry process.”

In July, Tory MSP Murdo Fraser told the Press and Journal he had scrapped plans to attend the hearing because of his “grave concerns” at the way the process has been handled.

The Mid Scotland and Fife MSP was due to represent residents concerned about the visual impact of the pylons but decided it would be “a fruitless exercise”, describing the event as “utterly discredited” and in need of ministerial intervention.

The Press and Journal

20 August 2007

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate


News Watch Home

Get the Facts Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

Wind Watch on Facebook


© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.