LOCATION/TYPE

NEWS HOME

[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Archive
RSS

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Get weekly updates

WHAT TO DO
when your community is targeted

RSS

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Paypal

Donate via Stripe

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links

Alerts

Press Releases

FAQs

Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics

Videos

Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

Baldacci tells commissioners to avoid improper contacts 

After Conservation Commissioner Patrick McGowan admitted he improperly discussed a pending case with a Land Use Regulation commissioner, Gov. John Baldacci has ordered his cabinet members to undergo refresher training on discussions with regulatory agencies.

“They got to be reminded,” Baldacci said in an interview Thursday. “Guidance is being provided through the Attorney General’s Office and what I have done is direct the counsel, Mike Mahoney, my counsel, to work with the guidance that has been provided with the other commissioners and make sure they all know.”

Baldacci said several commissioners, including McGowan, have regulatory bodies within their agencies.

All cabinet members need to be sure that any contact they have with regulators is within the limits of the process established by the agencies.

“The process needs to be protected,” Baldacci said. “The people who I have appointed to the board I respect greatly their decision making, and I want that adhered to.”

He said he has been assured that the improper discussion did not influence LURC decisions.

“I should not have talked to that commission member,” McGowan said Thursday. “That was an error, and I fully admit it. I should not have done it; it was wrong.”

He said the improper discussion took place after a vote on a proposed wind power project by Maine Mountain Power on Redington Mountain near Sugarloaf.

LURC rejected the original plan that called for 30 turbines on two mountains and later approved 18 turbines on one mountain.

The project was controversial. Several environmental groups opposed the original proposal. The scaled-backed project was suggested by the Natural Resources Council of Maine.

McGowan said if he had been trying to influence the vote on the larger project, he would have approached the commission member before the January vote.

“I just left the Attorney General’s Office and there was nothing illegal done,” McGowan said. “I was advised that I should refrain from discussions about particular projects, but I can in fact discuss with the staff that works at the Department of Conservation their needs and issues.”

Assistant Attorney General Jerry Reed, who advises LURC, refused to comment. He spoke to the LURC Wednesday morning about the issue at a public session, but later refused to summarize his advice.

Attorney General Steve Rowe couldn’t be reached for comment.

Several state laws and regulations govern proceedings of the quasi-judicial agencies like the LURC.

Baldacci said he was assured that McGowan’s inappropriate contact, which he said was clearly wrong, had not swayed any votes on the panel.

“The commissioners have indicated that this did not influence their votes,” he said. “That’s important.”

McGowan said he had approached a commission member because of his concern about the speed with which the panel was handling applications and the strain that was placing on staff.

While LURC is independent, its staff is part of the Department of Conservation and the administrative responsibility of DOC.

“I am concerned about the staff and the amount of workload they have,” McGowan said. “There has been a tremendous increase in the workload at LURC.”

LURC met Thursday in Greenville, but calls to its chairman and co-chairman were not returned Thursday evening.

By Mal Leary
Capitol News Service

sunjournal.com

3 August 2007

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
   Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)
Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)

Share:

e-mail X FB LI M TG TS G Share


News Watch Home

Get the Facts
CONTACT DONATE PRIVACY ABOUT SEARCH
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.

 Follow:

Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook Wind Watch on Linked In

Wind Watch on Mastodon Wind Watch on Truth Social

Wind Watch on Gab Wind Watch on Bluesky