[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


News Home

Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Sign up for daily updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

Council's actions over wind farm given nod by judge  

Another wind farm near Palmerston North came a step closer today when a High Court judge ruled in favour of a city council plan to add an additional purpose to its Turitea Reserve.

Palmerston North City Council required the addition to legally allow Mighty River Power to apply for a resource consent to develop a windfarm on the reserve.

If it goes ahead, the new wind farm will be the fourth in the area.

The resource consent process including public consultation will be a further step in the proposed windfarm development.

In August 2005 the council signed a partnership deal with Mighty River Power to develop a $300 million wind farm on the reserve, 10km east of the central city.

The additional purpose was one of three issues challenged by opponents of the windfarm who requested a High Court decision by Justice David Baragwanath.

In his decision, released today, Justice Baragwanath rejected the argument of the Friends of the Turitea Reserve Society that the additional purpose was illegal.

He said the generation of power by means of wind turbines was a legitimate council purpose.

The decision means the upper reaches of the reserve can potentially be used for a windfarm which would increase the revenue stream to allow for the creation of an eco-park.

The judge rejected arguments that the council was biased and its decision unreasonable, and he also rejected the contention that the council failed properly to consult.

It could not fairly be said that anyone truly interested had lacked the opportunity to respond to the essential issues in the decision-making process, Justice Baragwanath said.

“Nor has there been loss of opportunity for the public to assist the council to reach the optimum conclusion whether or not that conclusion is accepted.”

He was satisfied that the requirements of the common law, the Reserves Act and the Local Government Act as to consultation had not been infringed.

The council said tonight the decision was a vindication of its processes and obligations.

Windfarm Project leader Mike Manson said the council set out to be fair and reasonable throughout the consultation process and the judge has “confirmed the actions we took”.

“Our goal has always been to establish an eco-park in the Turitea Reserve funded by the revenue stream from the windfarm. This decision allows that initiative to proceed to the next stage,” he said.

Mayor Heather Tanguay was delighted.

“It’s the right decision given the absolute urgency of the need to mitigate the effects of climate change through the production of alternative energy,” she said.



26 July 2007

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate


News Watch Home

Get the Facts Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

Wind Watch on Facebook


© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.