LOCATION/TYPE

NEWS HOME

[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Archive
RSS

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Get weekly updates

WHAT TO DO
when your community is targeted

RSS

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Paypal

Donate via Stripe

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links

Alerts

Press Releases

FAQs

Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics

Videos

Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

Plans for 81-metre wind turbine in Lambourn Woodlands to go before committee in August 

The decision on whether West Berkshire will get its first wind turbine has been delayed.

The planning application for an 81m-high turbine next to the M4 at Baydon Meadow, Lambourn Woodlands, has been transferred to committee level at West Berkshire Council.

A final yes or no was expected this month, but will not come until August.

Council spokeswoman Peta Stoddart-Crompton explained: “Due to the complexities of this application extra time has been allowed for consultation to ensure that there is enough information to allow members to make an informed decision.”

The plans – likely to cost more than £1m – come from husband and wife duo Matt and Rachel Partridge and are a resubmission of a five-year-old application which was rejected because of the detrimental impact it would have on the surrounding area.
The turbine could provide enough clean electricity to supply 640 typical UK homes – about one-third of all homes in Baydon and Lambourn.

A website has been set up to promote the community ownership of the turbine at www.baydonmeadow.co.uk

The South East of England Regional Assembly has written to West Berkshire Council to confirm that the Baydon Meadow proposal does not conflict with either the adopted or the emerging Regional Spatial Strategy (RSS).

The report assessed the proposal against 14 adopted and emerging regional policies and concluded that the wind turbine would not “materially conflict” and would contribute to the sub-regional renewable energy target for 2010.

By Carla Payne, Reporter

Newbury Today

19 July 2007

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
   Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)
Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)

Share:

e-mail X FB LI TG TG Share


News Watch Home

Get the Facts
CONTACT DONATE PRIVACY ABOUT SEARCH
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.

 Follow:

Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook

Wind Watch on Linked In Wind Watch on Mastodon