[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


News Home

Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Sign up for daily updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

Summit Ridge files suit against Wilton  

Summit Ridge Energy filed suit June 28 against the town of Wilton and the Monroe County Sanitation, Planning & Zoning and Forestry Department because the town vetoed a conditional use permit to build wind turbines and accessory structures on five properties.

The landowners who granted easements to Summit Ridge Energy are Denis Burken and Mary Corlis, Toby Lee and Joan Greendeer-Lee, William and Marlys Waege, Robert and Dorothy Wilson Sr., Thomas and Pam Prochaska.

The easements allow the energy company to construct General Electric wind turbine(s), transformer(s), access roads and underground collection and fiber optic cable.

The lawsuit states that the town’s veto “exceeded its powers and jurisdiction; was contrary to law, arbitrary, oppressive, and unreasonable, representing its will and not its judgment; and that it could not have been reasonably made based on the evidence before it.”

The suit refers to state statute 66.0401, which limits the ability to restrict solar or wind energy systems. A restriction must serve to preserve and protect public health and safety, not increase the cost of the system or decrease its efficiency, or allow for an alternative system of comparable cost and efficiency.

June 12, Wilton held a public hearing for the conditional use permit, which the town supervisors vetoed 2-1. In favor of the veto were Chairperson Rick Irwin and Supervisor Tim O’Rourke. Supervisor Jan Brandau voted against the veto.

“The Committee itself acted in an arbitrary and unreasonable manner when it deliberated on and approved the conditional use permit because it did not base its decision on evidence presented at the public hearing and failed to make relevant findings of fact and conclusions of law based on the evidence,” said the town of Wilton veto. “Based on the Committee’s approval of the conditional use permit in the same form as the [permits] it previously approved for Ridgeville and Wells, the Committee’s decision on this [permit] was clearly biased in favor of Summit Ridge Energy.”

The veto said the Sanitation, Planning & Zoning and Forestry Committee approved a permit that was essentially the same as the permit for the towns of Ridgeville and Wells. It said there was no specific discussion or findings related to the how the project would affect the residents of Wilton.

The Committee’s decision was based on a Montfort, WI, windfarm, which is not similar to the proposed project in Wilton, according to the veto. It said the land in Montfort is very flat and there were greater setbacks (limits) between wind turbines and nearby residents.

It also said the Committee did not even consider or discuss the studies and testimony presented by town residents and others at the hearing, which showed the wind turbines would cause serious public health and safety problems. The problems included noise, ice throw and shadow flicker which could occur unless setbacks were increased from residences, occupied buildings, public roads, and property lines.

The conditional use permit application was incomplete, according to the veto. It said there was no map of the area showing parcel boundaries, lease boundaries, wind turbine(s) and accessory structures.

The towns of Ridgeville and Wilton both vetoed the conditional use permit. The town of Wells took no action on the permit, which was then automatically approved. The Monroe County Sanitation, Planning & Zoning and Forestry Department, Ridgeville and Wilton have all been sued by Summit Ridge Energy. William Semann and Myron Brueggeman, both with property in Wells, filed lawsuit against the Sanitation, Planning & Zoning and Forestry Department.

By Keith Zukas

The Tomah Journal

5 July 2007

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate


News Watch Home

Get the Facts Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

Wind Watch on Facebook


© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.