[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


News Home

Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Sign up for daily updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

Delays stop city from purchasing wind power  

Wind power was supposed to become part of Columbia’s energy mix on Sunday, but delays at the wind farm providing the electricity and ongoing bureaucratic holdups stand in the way.

Wind turbines at the King City farm in northwest Missouri are up and running, but the electricity is not yet available for Columbia to purchase because of testing delays, said Nancy Southworth, a spokeswoman for Associated Electric Cooperative.

Columbia, meanwhile, continues to negotiate with the regulatory body that oversees power transmission in the Midwest about whether there is enough space in the regional electrical grid to get the wind power to Columbia.

Dan Dasho, Columbia’s Water and Light director, said that although delays at the wind farm allow more time to work out a solution, he is far less hopeful than he was two weeks ago, when negotiations with Midwest Independent System Operator, or MISO, began.

“I am worried that we won’t be able to get the wind power until February 2008,” Dasho said.

Negotiations between Columbia Water and Light and MISO have been ongoing for almost four months, and Dasho said the talks haven’t progressed.

At this point, MISO is offering a “non-firm” contract for wind energy delivery, meaning the electricity would be transmitted when there is space on the grid. Columbia would be the first customer to be cut if transmission space wasn’t available, Dasho said.

Connie Kacprowicz, spokeswoman for Columbia Water and Light, said the city is still hoping to work with MISO and look at other options to get the wind energy delivered.

As for delays at the wind farm, Kacprowicz said they should be resolved in 30 to 60 days. Wind Capital Group, which owns the Missouri wind farm, has to declare the power commercially available before it can be used by Columbia.

Despite the July 1 contract start date with Associated Electric for wind energy delivery, the contract will not begin until wind-generated electricity is available, Dasho said.

“Associated has been very understanding with us while we are working with MISO. It’s been a very amicable relationship,” Kacprowicz said.

The city has a contract with Associated Electric to transmit 7 megawatts of wind-generated electricity to Columbia – 2 percent of the city’s total electric consumption.

The problem lies in the amount of energy that MISO will allow in the electrical transmission system. The 7 megawatts would put the Southwest Power Pool’s system, which is tied to Associated Electric’s system, 0.3 megawatts above its capacity.

MISO is a not-for-profit organization established in part by the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission. Its role is to help control wholesale power transmission, maintain the power grid and prevent large power outages in 15 Midwest states and Manitoba, Canada.

In order to transmit energy over any electrical grid in the Midwest, a request must be made to MISO. The organization then fills energy requests on a first-come, first-served basis until transmission capacity is filled.

Kacprowicz said the city might have to buy energy off the wholesale market to cover the 7 megawatts of energy that it is missing – a common practice in the summer.

“We generally have to buy power on the wholesale market to cover the summer load,” she said.

The spring and fall are more favorable for wind energy. Summer months are especially unreliable.

“Even with the 7 megawatts of wind energy, we can’t be very dependent on it during the summer months. It’s not a dependable source of energy in the summer months,” Kacprowicz said.

By Liz Langton

Columbia Missourian

4 July 2007

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate


News Watch Home

Get the Facts Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

Wind Watch on Facebook


© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.