[ exact phrase in "" • ~10 sec • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]

LOCATION/TYPE

News Home
Archive
RSS

Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Sign up for daily updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links

Alerts

Press Releases

FAQs

Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics

Videos

Allied Groups

Wind farm 'a threat to our airport'  

Southend Airport has raised serious objections to plans to build a new wind farm – even though the turbines would be nearly 15 miles to the north.

Aviation experts say a wind farm next to the defunct nuclear power station, at Bradwell, could raise air traffic control issues and might even interfere with radar.

Airport managing director Alistair Welch raised the concerns at a public inquiry which is being held in Maldon.

Maldon Council and local residents’ groups in the area around Bradwell are also objecting to the plan.

Mr Welch said new wind farm developers were legally obliged to consult any airports within an 18-mile radius.

He added: “We look at each application on its merits and have not objected to proposals in the Thames Estuary.

“It is well documented wind turbines can have an adverse effect on air traffic control and in particular the radar.

“The turbines can clutter the radar display used by controllers, which could pose an increased risk to the safe control of our aircraft.”

While the airport did not have concerns about offshore wind farms, Mr Welch was worried about the Bradwell plans for a number of reasons.

Many were connected to to the relationship between with wind farm site and the flightpaths of aircraft using Southend Airport, once plans to extend the runway were implemented.

“It would also be in proximity to existing constraints on flying, with the exclusion zones around Bradwell Power Station and the firing ranges on Foulness Island,” he added.

“We have strongly objected to the proposals and hope our views will be taken into consideration by the inspector.”

Echo

22 June 2007

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate

Share:


News Watch Home

Get the Facts Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

Wind Watch on Facebook

Share

CONTACT DONATE PRIVACY ABOUT SEARCH
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.
Share

Wind Watch on Facebook

Follow Wind Watch on Twitter