LOCATION/TYPE

NEWS HOME


[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]

Archive
RSS

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

WHAT TO DO
when your community is targeted

Get weekly updates
RSS

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Stripe

Donate via Paypal

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links

Alerts

Press Releases

FAQs

Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics

Videos

Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

Wind farm opponents file suit against McLean County 

A bloc of homeowners sued McLean County this week to halt progress on a planned wind farm near Carlock, claiming public officials denied due process by blocking the views of opponents.

The county board in March granted Invenergy Wind’s request for a special-use permit to construct a 100-turbine White Oak Wind Energy Center straddling the McLean-Woodford county border. Construction could start this summer, pending the approval of building permits and the outcome of this lawsuit.

McLean County Administrator John Zeunik could not comment on the case but noted that the zoning board held lengthy public hearings on the wind farm before recommending approval of the project to the county board. The McLean County Zoning Board of Appeals recommended a special-use permit for the project on Feb. 8 after 12 days of often-heated testimony.

Zeunik referred all questions to assistant state’s attorneys Brian Hug and Eric Ruud, who were out of the office Friday.

The suit – filed by Information is Power, a nonprofit organization of homeowners affected by the development – claims the county denied landowners’ rights to fully express opposition to the project and didn’t seek independent review of Invenergy’s application, according to documents filed in the case. The county slanted proceedings to Invenergy’s favor by changing procedural rules and hearing times and limiting testimony of the opposition to five minutes per person, the complaint states.

By Scott Miller

Pantagraph

15 June 2007

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Contributions
   Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)
Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)

Share:

e-mail X FB LI M TG TS G Share


News Watch Home

Get the Facts
CONTACT DONATE PRIVACY ABOUT SEARCH
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.

 Follow:

Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook Wind Watch on Linked In

Wind Watch on Mastodon Wind Watch on Truth Social

Wind Watch on Gab Wind Watch on Bluesky